Loading...
主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Table of Content

    16 February 2021, Volume 55 Issue 2 Previous Issue    Next Issue

    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Rethinking and Transcending the Living Dilemma of “Possessive Individuals”——On the Contemporary Significance of Marx's Thought of “Rebuilding Individual Ownership”
    He Lai, Peng Shuangzhen
    2021, 55 (2):  5-15. 
    Abstract ( 901 )   PDF (7647KB) ( 668 )  
    Aiming at the survival dilemma of “possessive individuals” in modern society, that is, the paradox of individual “selfloss” and the “anomie” situation of modern society, thinkers based on the perspective of “relational subject”, reflected on the ethicalpolitical level. Transcendence, but their plan did not really touch and change the state of existence of people in capitalist society. In contrast, from the unique perspective of ownership relations, Marx examined the characteristics and living conditions of modern individuals, proposed to rebuild individual ownership, and shape new individual lifestyles through the establishment of new methods of possession, there by reflecting and transcending modern assets. The survival dilemma of possessive individuals in class society provides a unique path.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Different Examination of Communism and Social Revolution——Reexplore the Ideological Confrontation between Marx and Proudonism
    Yang Hongyuan
    2021, 55 (2):  16-26. 
    Abstract ( 765 )   PDF (8514KB) ( 206 )  
    Criticism and construction are the typical characteristics of Marx's thought. To grasp the original appearance and transcendence of Marxs thought comprehensively and accurately, and get the enlightenment of methodology from it, we need to understand the theory or ideological reference system of his critical object. In the face of communism and social revolution, Marx and Proudonism launched a fierce ideological confrontation around the origin and basic principles of communism, the review of the history of communism, the feasibility and realization of communism, and the criteria for communism to judge social revolution. In this process, Marx and Proudonism launched a fierce ideological confrontation, and in the process confirmed and enriched their own views. Taking this as a mirror, we should appeal to the profundity and thoroughness of the theory in the debate with the wrong ideological trend. Only in this way can the theory really grasp the masses and become the material force of social revolution.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Modernization of National Redistribution Capacity: Institutional Implication and Chinese Context
    Pang Qingming
    2021, 55 (2):  27-36. 
    Abstract ( 493 )   PDF (7858KB) ( 199 )  
    As a national redistribution system and its executive ability, the national redistribution ability is only the expression of the historical production relations. In the new era, the modernization of China's national redistributive capacity is the proper meaning of the modernization of the socialist country's economic governance capacity, the necessary way to solve the current major social contradictions, and the important guarantee to achieve the two centenary goals. Only by adhering to the dominant position of public ownership, adhering to distribution according to law, and focusing on effectively promoting the coordination and balance of interests of different social groups in the process of indirect distribution, can we gradually achieve the expected goal of modernization of redistribution capacity.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Three Theoretical Dimensions of Technocracy and Its Contemporary Development
    Lan Lishan, Liu Yongmou
    2021, 55 (2):  37-45. 
    Abstract ( 838 )   PDF (6848KB) ( 373 )  
    After the failure of the technocracy movement, technocracy has changed from radical to moderate, which plays an important role in the development and governance of today's society. However, people still hold a general critical attitude toward technocracy and have a misunderstanding for contemporary form and realistic value of technocracy nowadaysThus, the article will analyze the content and the contemporary development of the three main theoretical dimensions of technocracy, namely, economic theory, political theory and social governance theory, whose aim is to get a comprehensive understanding and thorough recognizing for the connotation, function and limitations of technocracy, and to provide a basis for playing the value of technocracy in social operation fully and the theoretical reconstruction of technocracy
    Related Articles | Metrics
    A Study of the Global Migration Overnance:Realistic Predicaments and Practical Turn
    Sun Zhiwei, Guo Shuyong
    2021, 55 (2):  46-55. 
    Abstract ( 581 )   PDF (7945KB) ( 319 )  
    The growing scale of international population flows has prompted international migration to transform from a marginal policy field to a mainstream issue closely related to politics, economy and society. Due to the obsolescence of concepts, the politicization of ethnic issues, the security of immigration issues and other factors, the current governance field is facing a series of difficulties and there has been a certain degree of practical turn. In order to promote global migration governance towards good governance, reforms should be the guide, global migration governance should be improved, and a multilevel organic multilateral governance mechanism combining bilateral governance, regional multilateral governance, and global multilateral governance of participating countries should be balanced to reflect most countries. The willingness and interests of international migrants continue to adapt to the new changes in the crossborder migration pattern of international migrants, support the improvement of the multilateral system, and promote common development.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The New Welfare Risk of Modern Capitalist States: Performance, Reason and Response
    Ran Hao
    2021, 55 (2):  56-67. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (9527KB) ( )  
    The welfare risk of capitalism is changing from “new social risk” to “new welfare risk”. It includes the new social security risk caused by the refugee tide, the new social policy risk caused by the aggravation of inequality and populism, the new labor risk caused by the industrial structure change in the Internet era, and the new family policy risk promoted by work family imbalance. The root cause of the variation of welfare risk in capitalist countries is that the capitalist mode of production based on the grab of surplus value and the existence of private ownership can not overcome the contradiction between the marketization of production system and the non commercialization of distribution system, resulting in the welfare supply that can be realized by the capitalist government can not accommodate the welfare needs of the middle and lower classes. To this end, capitalist countries should strengthen the government's intervention in secondary distribution and implement a series of more active welfare policies. However, the capitalist mode of production has always been unable to root out the spiral variation and upgrading of welfare risks, as well as the resulting cyclical welfare crisis.   
    Related Articles | Metrics
    New Characteristics of American Income Differentiation and Its Multidimensional Driving Factors
    Wang Yang, Ji Hong
    2021, 55 (2):  68-81. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (10819KB) ( )  
    王阳,天津城建大学外国语学院讲师、中国社会科学院研究生院博士生(天津 300384,北京 102488);姬虹,中国社会科学院美国研究所研究员(北京100720)。
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Individual Value of Patriotism Education
    Wen Jing
    2021, 55 (2):  82-89. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6613KB) ( )  
    The research on the individual value of patriotism education aims at eliminating peoples misunderstanding of patriotism education and strengthening patriotism education in the new era. To clarify the individual value of patriotism education from three dimensions of starting point, process and evaluation is helpful to confirm the rationality of patriotic education, improve the effectiveness of patriotic education, and highlight the human nature of patriotic education. Patriotism education promotes individual growth and development from four aspects: sublimation of emotional realm, construction of identity, shaping of values and guidance of growth and practice through emotion, reason, teaching and guidance. To realize the individual value of patriotism education, we should stimulate the demand side to enhance the internal drive of individuals, and reform the supply side to enhance the pertinence of patriotic education.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Dynamic Analysis of British Academia on the Research of XI Jinping's Thoughts of  Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in New Era
    Geng Huamin, Luo Jiannan
    2021, 55 (2):  90-99. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7782KB) ( )  
    As a traditional center of overseas Chinese studies, the British academic circles have paid much attention to Xi Jinpings thoughts on socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era. This thesis uses the British database and statistical methods to show the appearance of this research based on the British academic platform; it focuses on the analysis of the definition and interpretation of “new thoughts”, the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and the overall strict governance of the party, comprehensive deepening of reforms, and major power diplomacy. The thesis discusses the main topics of the British academic circles and summarize its research characteristics, as well as their existing problems and value limits, so as to provide other lessons for the scientific construction of XI Jinping's “new thoughts” academic interpretation system.
    Related Articles | Metrics
     A Tailored Populist Concept for Emerging RightWing Conservatives——A Critique of Müller's Populism Theory
    Cong Riyun
    2021, 55 (2):  100-108. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6936KB) ( )  
    Müller's definition of populism is fraught with confusion by excluding what scholars typically identify as leftwing populism in Europe and the United States, and the populist label tailored for the emerging rightwing conservatives who are the very antithesis of mainstream (leftwing) populism. He endeavored to find a unified and unique criterion of populism and negates some standard features frequently used by academic circles through the exclusion method. However, the highly narrowed definition of populism that he obtained by this method remained to intersect with other political thoughts, and his empirical evidence for this definition was still disordered. Moreover, his sympathy and support to the leftwing populism that manifests he is a populist accurately.
    Related Articles | Metrics