Loading...
主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Table of Content

    16 August 2025, Volume 59 Issue 8 Previous Issue   

    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    The Evolutionary Trajectory of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture and the Process of Its Systematization and Theorization
    Liu Cang1, 2
    2025, 59 (8):  5-17. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (14665KB) ( )  
    Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), the Party has placed cultural progress in a prominent position in its governance. It has made strategic plans through the CPC National Congresses, deployed tasks through the National Conference on Public Communication, and pointed out the implementation pathways through the reform and development plans for the cultural sector, promoting the continuous systematization and practical application of the Partys new ideas, viewpoints and theories on cultural progress in the new era. General Secretary Xi Jinping has attended a series of important meetings, delivered a series of important speeches, and made a series of important propositions, continuously promoting the scientification and theorization of the Partys important ideas on publicity, ideological and cultural work. During this period, considering the new cultural missions in the new era, we have constantly refined new concepts, summarized new categories, put forward new propositions, and formed relatively independent new principles. The main thread of the formation of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture is a process of the dialectical unity of its overall structure, key areas and core propositions being constantly enriched, interconnected and mutually reinforcing, and moving parallel to the systematization and theorization of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. The thought on cultural progress of the Party in the new era has also gone through a process of continuous refinement and sublimation from “important propositions” and “important thought” to “Xi Jinping Thought on Culture”.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Three Basic Premises for Comparing Chinese and Western Modernization
    Yu Genxiong
    2025, 59 (8):  18-41. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7782KB) ( )  
    Comparisons between Chinese and Western modernization must adhere to rigorous scholarly parameters. Comparisons without premises are not conducive to the scientific exploration of the Chinese path to modernization. The following three basic premises should be established. The first one is the conceptual premise, which requires clarifying the “common characteristics” of modernization to define its universal patterns. Considering production modes as decisive factors in social development, the universal features of modernization can be identified as the “largescale machine industry” and “socialized mass production”. Second, the historical premise necessitates examining the “established realities” of modernization to delineate its developmental status. In todays global landscape, capitalist modernized nations, though longestablished, face challenges on sustainability, while socialist modernization in China has secured important progress but there is still a long road towards its national rejuvenation goals. Finally, the value premise demands clarifying the “spatiotemporal coordinates” of modernization to assess the worldhistorical significance of each developmental path. According to the dialectical relationship between the universality and diversity of human historical development, the specific modernization paths are not mutually exclusive opposites, but a community of equality and mutual learning. These premises simultaneously demarcate the boundaries for comparing Chinese and Western modernization. Only within these boundaries can such comparisons yield rational, scientific conclusions with universal persuasiveness.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    New Interpretation of Marx's Concept of “Matter”: Based on Two Ways of Understanding the Concept of “Matter” in Modern Materialism
    Zhao Likai
    2025, 59 (8):  29-41. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (9465KB) ( )  
    The concept of “matter” in modern materialism has been developed along two pathways. The first one is mechanistic materialism, represented primarily by Hobbes and Descartes that influenced French materialism in the 18th century. The second is “sensuous materialism”, chiefly reflected in the philosophy of Bacon and Feuerbach. Marxs concept of “matter” originates primarily from the view of “sensuous matter” in sensuous materialism, while acquiring its dialectical character through inheriting Hegelian dialectics. Marxs concept of “matter”, which integrates the principles of both sensuousness and dialectics, manifests a dual structure of “sensuous being” and “Daesin”, wherein “Daesin” emerges immanently from “sensuous being”. This conceptual framework is the basis for Marx to grasp objects as “senseable and supersenseable”, and to establish historical materialism and Marxist political economy. Lenin inherits Marxs concept of matter. Only by integrating Lenins definition of “matter” with the thought of dialectical materialism articulated in Notes on Philosophy can we holistically comprehend Lenins concept of “matter” and its unity and consistency with Marxs concept of “matter”.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Narrative Construction and Disciplinary Development of CPC History during the New Democratic Revolution Period 
    Zhao Ziyu, Li Jiajin
    2025, 59 (8):  42-53. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (12688KB) ( )  
    The New Democratic Revolution period is a critical phase for the construction of the narrative of the Communist Party of China (CPC)s “revolutionary history”, which serves the needs of real politics. From the early days of the Party when theorists like Cai Hesen initially explained the Party history with the core concepts of historical materialism, to the formation of a narrative criticizing rightwing opportunism after the failure of the Great Revolution, and then to the reconstruction of Party history with the struggle between the two political lines as the main thread during the Yanan period, a classic narrative of revolutionary history was ultimately shaped. During this process, the core idea of historical materialism, the cultural resource of Confucian approach to history, and the reference from History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks) jointly shaped the basic features of the narrative of CPC history. The historical experience of this period indicates that disciplinary institutionalization is the inevitable way for the narrative of Party history to fully exert its political function. During the Yanan period, through the popularization of the narrative of Party history, the standardization of its textbooks, and the professionalization of the teaching team, the initial formation of the discipline of CPC history was promoted. The construction of the narrative of CPC history during the New Democratic Revolution period demonstrated the unique historical perspective of the CPC, shaped the writing paradigm of CPC history after the founding of the Peoples Republic of China, and provided profound historical experience for the contemporary narrative of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Conceptual Perception, Institutional Architecture, and Future Prospects of Digital Party Building
    Wang Ye
    2025, 59 (8):  54-64. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (8467KB) ( )  
    Empowering Party building through digital technology is a new challenge faced by the theory and practice of Party building in the new era. Digital Party building emerges as a practical path where technology supports and improves Party building. Its core characteristics lie in the deep integration of innovation, interactivity, and replicability, while its development process relies on the solid support of institutional design, organizational systems, and operational mechanisms. Amid the dynamic tension between technological iteration, institutional construction, and value consensus, the development of digital Party building faces practical challenges such as organizational fragmentation, diminished agency, and technological security risks, while also containing historical opportunities for efficiency leaps. Adapting to the requirements of the times and practice, continuously promoting the cultivation of digital concepts and thinking, constantly improving the institutional system and practical models of digital Party building, and maintaining a balanced development of values and institutions, order and vitality, as well as experience and knowledge, are of great significance for the Communist Party of China to reinforce its selfbuilding and better play its leading role.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    From “Spontaneity” to “Consciousness”: Lenin on Ideological Consciousness, Political Firmness, and Organizational Unity in What Is To Be Done?
    Li Zhongjun, Liu Zirui
    2025, 59 (8):  65-73. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6815KB) ( )  
    What Is To Be Done? is a classic work by Lenin that systematically criticizes the trend of economism in Russia. It identifies the root cause of this trend which lies in the blind worship of spontaneity and the downplaying of the role of socialist consciousness in the workers movement, emphasizing the necessity to elevate Party building to a conscious level. Lenin not only profoundly expounds on why and how ideological construction should be conscious but also creatively points out the premise and foundational role of ideological construction in political and organizational construction, thereby laying substantial groundwork for establishing a genuine Marxist party in Russia. Lenins profound understanding of the dialectical relationship between “spontaneity” and “consciousness” essentially answers the major questions of whether and how to conduct ideological and political education. A full comprehension of Lenins scientific analysis of and practical approach to the ideological consciousness, political firmness, and organizational unity of Marxist parties in What Is To Be Done? has significant theoretical and practical value for Party building in the new era.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Establishing a System-integrated Educational Mechanism for Ideological and Political Education
    Lan Botao, Qin Ruzheng
    2025, 59 (8):  74-82. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7133KB) ( )  
    System integration is an important feature of comprehensively deepening reform and a scientific methodology for promoting the innovative development of ideological and political education in the new era. To establish an educational mechanism for ideological and political education with system integration as the methodology, it is necessary to grasp the profound implications of its systematic, holistic, and collaborative characteristics. From the perspective of value, this mechanism is not only an inevitable requirement of following the laws of ideological and political education and talent growth but also an inherent part of promoting the highquality development of ideological and political education. It is also a significant measure for building a comprehensive, allprocess, and allround educational framework. To promote the construction of a scientific, open, and sustainable mechanism for ideological and political education, efforts should be made from three dimensions: strengthening toplevel design, optimizing the educational system, and promoting diverse collaboration, thereby injecting systemic momentum into the reform and innovation of ideological and political education in the new era.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Labor-value Commodity Chains and Global Labor Arbitrage: A Critical Analysis of Intan Suwandi's Theory of New Economic Imperialism 
    Gao Jiankun, Yang Jiayu
    2025, 59 (8):  83-92. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7665KB) ( )  
    The American scholar, Intan Suwandi, constructs a theoretical-analytical framework which is centered on the concept of the “labor-value commodity chain” and informed by the notion of new economic imperialism. She clarifies the core mechanism of the international transfer of surplus value, examines the issue of global labor arbitrage, and illustrates the reality of the construction of globalized imperialist hierarchies with case studies to reveal the essence of new economic imperialism in the laborvalue commodity chain. Intan Suwandis theory of new economic imperialism provides a novel theoretical perspective for examining the interest relations in the contemporary imperialist economic system, while the corresponding empirical studies and case analysis constitute the empirical expansion of research on imperialism. 

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Industrial Policy and Industrial Development Capabilities of Global South Nations in Green Energy Value Chains
    Xu Yanran
    2025, 59 (8):  93-108. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (12513KB) ( )  
    Since the 20th century, the global economic system has undergone profound structural transformation, with international trade gradually shifting from the traditional division of labor based on final products to a new paradigm centered on production tasks, thus promoting the formation and expansion of global value chains. Against this backdrop, developed countries usually dominate the free trade system, while countries in the Global South often participate in a passive or subordinate manner. However, with the expansion of global production networks, some Southern countries, leveraging their resource endowments and policy support, have gradually gained more active roles in areas such as green energy. The reshaping of global value chains provides a new development model for the energy industry, and the rise of green energy has gradually transformed the position of Southern countries in the international division of labor from the periphery to the center. Comparing the cases of China and Brazil, this paper analyzes the impact of their industrial policies on industrial development capabilities (the innovation level, manufacturing capacity, market scale), and further explores the differences in the positions of countries in the Global South in green energy value chains. These Southern countries cultivate industrial development capabilities through autonomous, balanced, and dependent industrial policies, thus presenting different development paths of leapfrogging, advancing, or stagnation within the global value chains. Through comparative case analysis, this paper reveals how countries in the Global South can upgrade their green energy industries through industrial policies and gain greater industrial competitiveness in the global value chains.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    A Critical Analysis of Global Governance Reform Driven by the Global South 
    Zhu Xu, Wang Tianyu
    2025, 59 (8):  109-121. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (10177KB) ( )  
    The current global governance system is facing problems such as the imbalanced power architecture, insufficient supply of governance mechanisms, and inadequate implementation of effective governance values, making it difficult to effectively address global challenges. As a collective of emerging economies and developing countries, the “Global South” is becoming an important collective force for promoting global governance reform that focuses on enhancing representation and voice, reshaping fair rules, and innovating governance models in key areas. However, the “Global South” faces multiple challenges in the process of promoting global governance reform: the longstanding power gap between the North and the South, the collective action dilemma within the “Global South” itself, and the maintenance of the existing hegemonic order by Western countries and their differentiation strategies towards the “Global South”. Therefore, the “Global South” needs to take the enhancement of its comprehensive strength as foundation, deepen regional governance and practical cooperation in specific governance areas, and actively participate in existing initiatives to promote gradual reform, ultimately achieving transformation towards a more just and rational global governance architecture.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Going Beyond the False Dichotomy between “Structuralist” and “Instrumentalist” Views of the State: Reinterpreting the Poulantzas-Miliband Debate
    Liu Li1, Meng Jie2
    2025, 59 (8):  122-134. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (9178KB) ( )  
    How to conceive the relative autonomy of the state, or the relationship between state power and class power, based on historical materialism is a critical issue that must be addressed in the study of Marxist state theory. In the 1960s and 1970s, Poulantzas and Miliband engaged in a debate around this issue, building upon their respective research. In Marxist intellectual history, this debate is often referred to as the controversy between “structuralism” versus “instrumentalism”. This paper, by tracing the development process of theories of the two, points out that such an evaluation not only artificially creates a binary theoretical predicament but also overlooks their intellectual developments. From constructing a “regional” theory of politics to proposing the theory of the state as a social relation, Poulantzas ultimately provides a new perspective different from structuralism. Miliband, starting from criticizing the state elite theory, turns to emphasize the structural constraints of the mode of production on the functions of the state, and conducts a critical reflection on the instrumentalist view of the state. Overall, the PoulantzasMiliband debate reveals the convergence of their understanding on the issue of the relative autonomy of the state, and their intellectual legacies provide valuable theoretical resources for further developing a more systematic Marxist theory of the state.

    Related Articles | Metrics