|
A Comparative Study of Enterprise Theories of Marx and Those of Western Neoinstitutional School
Zhang Yinjie
1998, (10):
46-51.
DOI:
The author points out that Marx was right when he regarded increase of productivity and social yield capacity as the basic cause for the rise of enterprises. The neoinstitutional school, on the contrary, ignored the productive function of enterprises and considered economizing the cost of dealings the only reason why enterprises came into being, which led their theories to a difficult position. Marx’ analysis of the reasons for enterprises to expand rested on an increase of productivity, while the neoinstitutional school used the notion of dealing cost to explain the extent of expansion. They were right in admitting that cost of management could affect the scale of enterprises.However, they were wrong to believe that dealing cost was the only aspect that could affect the scale of enterprises. Marx said that the basic relation inside capitalist enterprises was that of employment, while neoinstitutional school emphasized the relation of client and agent between the owner of capital and the manager of enterprise. Marx explained the reason for enterprises to exist as a hierarchical organization from the point of view of social division of work, while neoinstitutional school elaborated on the incompleteness of the social contract as the reason for the existence of the enterprise as a hierarchical organization. This argument, however, is not sound enough.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|