Table of Content

16 December 2019, Volume 53 Issue 12 Previous Issue    Next Issue

---

For Selected:

Download Citations EndNote Ris BibTeX

Toggle Thumbnails

Select

Marx's Communication Thoughts in His Late Years and Its Contemporary Value Wang Xiaohong 2019, 53 (12):  5-15.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (8405KB) ( )   In his late years, Marx developed his early theory of communication. He analyzed the types of communication from various perspectives, and made a deep historical investigation into the ways of communication such as war, religious reform, migration and immigration, colonization, violent plunder, marriage, international trade, which deepens the theory of historical materialism. Marx's communication thoughts in his late years is a theoretical tool for our correct understanding and effective response to globalization, a theoretical basis for putting forward and deepening of China's reform and opening up, a new perspective for the realization of people's allround development, and a theoretical source for the construction of a shared future for mankind community. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

On Marx's  Double Critique  on Hegel in Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right Zhang Xiao 2019, 53 (12):  16-22.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (5519KB) ( )   Critique is the key word in Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Marx's critique of Hegel mainly focuses on two aspects, namely, the  reversal  of methodology and the critique of social reality. Marx used the method of  reversal  to try to reveal Hegel's logical and pantheistic mysticism, and tried to reveal the essential contradiction of the political state at the time by criticizing the real society. Through the reversal also reveals the break between the civil society and the state. Hegel tried to solve this problem with the intermediary, but the particularity and special interests of the intermediary itself cannot solve it, Therefore, Marx believes that such an intermediary is meaningless, and should rely on the two themselves to find a way to resolve the contradiction. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

Rational Judgment of Industrial Structure in Different Stages of Economic Development——Based on the Perspective of Different National Development Experience Zhang Peili 2019, 53 (12):  23-35.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (12804KB) ( )   In 2018, the added value of Chinas three industries accounted for 72%, 407%, and 522% of GDP respectively. Is this industrial structure consistent with China's current development stage, and is it conducive to highquality development? Previous studies have focused on the allocation of factors between industries, but have not paid attention to the industrial structure standards at different stages of economic development. To this end, this paper summarizes the historical experiences of the industrial structure evolution of different countries at different stages of economic development, such as described by Kuznets and Channer, and the positive and negative laws of the industrial structure evolution of the typical countries that span the  middle income trap, as well as the stage standard for the evolution of industrial structure in developing countries. That is to say, the industrial proportion at the end of industrialization and the service industry account for about 40% and 50% respectively. China's industrial structure evolution is basically in line with the law of industrial evolution, but the current proportion of industrial and service industries has basically reached the level of completion of industrialization in other countries. Therefore, China's future industrial restructuring is no longer the main pursuit of the expansion of the tertiary industry, but to accelerate the development of the real economy and promote the overall quality of the tertiary industry. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

The Formation of IndoPacific Regional Security Complex and American Hegemonic Maintenance Sun Yunfei1, Liu Changming2 2019, 53 (12):  36-47.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (9592KB) ( )   It is the most important impetus for formation of regional security complexes that the security interaction between states becomes more closely. The hegemony intervenes in security affairs which takes advantage of characteristics of the identity structure and power structure of regional security complexes by penetration mechanism. With the rising of China and India as two great powers,indopacific region has already possessed the fundamental conditions of regional security complex. For maintaining predominance,the United States penetrates into the complex through allies and shapes the rules and order of indopacific regional security complex.There are three challenges that the United States has to take into account in this process:the distrust of American hegemony from alies or partners;divergence in strategic aims between America's and its allies; some states'  waitandsee attitude towards IndoPacific strategy of Ameica.Therefore, whether the IndoPacific strategy, as an upgraded version of  Return to the Asia Pacific strategy, can truly realize the goal of American hegemony remains to be verified. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

The Cause of the Richpoor Inequality and the Limitations of Its Redistribution in Welfare States Ran Hao 2019, 53 (12):  48-58.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (9273KB) ( )   Traditionally, the welfare state reforms are embodied in the marketization reforms represented by the Reagan Reform and the Thatcher Reform, which has been presumed as the reason for the increasing inequality between the richpoor since 1980s. The marketization argument as well as the Capital/Income argument by Piketty, however, are both unaccountable for the essential force for the widening gap between the richpoor. It is therefore necessary to review in the ProductionDistribution perspective: the production regime of the welfare state has the characteristics of the marketization or commodification, which naturally drives the consistent widening of the richpoor gap and testifies the Marx explanation upon the inequalities by the mode of production in Capitalism. In the meantime, the distribution regime of the welfare state has the characteristics of the nonmarketization or noncommodification, which to some extent makes the adjustment in the inequalities by the redistribution yet nonsignificantly. The limitations of the redistribution in welfare states are mainly reflected in that the reinforcement of the redistribution can neither restrain the expansion of the richpoor, nor meet the welfare demands, causing the alteration of the ideologies in the West from the ordinary people. The reasons of this limitations lie in the disordered intervention by the overlapping functions between the distribution and the redistribution, that the improper intervention by the ambiguity in publicprivate boundary in welfare provision, and that the rigidity of the welfare expansion track caused by path dependence of the welfare institution. The reevaluation of the richpoor gap widening, the limitations of the redistribution and their causes in welfare states from the perspective of the productiondistribution relation, is of great importance in deepening the comprehension of the internal operative mechanism of welfare states and its future development.  Related Articles | Metrics

Select

On the Basic Laws of Ideological and Political Education Wang Yi, Song Jianlin 2019, 53 (12):  59-67.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (7367KB) ( )   The law of ideological and political education is the essential connection and inevitable trend in ideological and political education, and it is a concentrated reflection of the essence of ideological and political education. The revelation of the basic laws of ideological and political education should be based on the three core categories of “thought”, “politics” and “education”, and find out three basic contradictions of ideological and political education: macro level, “political education” and “educational politics”; the middle level, the ideological contradiction of the subject and object of ideological and political education; the micro level, the contradiction between the ideological and political education object and the ideological freedom. From this, the three basic laws of ideological and political education are inferred: the unified law of scientific values   at the macro level, that is, from the perspective of attributes, ideological and political education is based on scientific premise and value is the pursuit, and the two are integrated; The twoway interaction law of the subject and object at the level, that is, the subject and object of ideological and political education takes  course  as the content and  confusion  as the focus, realizes the pursuit of  Tao  in the interaction; the microlevel internalization of social consciousness,that is, the individual should transform the social consciousness into the ideological concept and externalize the ideological concept into the behavior habit, so as to realize the transformation from the free state of thought to the selfstate of thought. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

Between Authority and Autonomy: The Value Orientation and Development of Moral Education in the United States Ren Zhifeng 2019, 53 (12):  68-76.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (6462KB) ( )   The value orientation of moraleducation stipulates its practice and developmentThe moral education in the United States generally has two value orientations: authority and autonomyThe former based on the Protestantism, it considered teaching religious morality and patriotism as the core, “teachingacceptance” logic as the principle, and the mandatory infusion as the main methodTo a large extent, this orientation shaped the traditional patterns of moral education in the United States from the colonial period to the 19th centuryThe latter based on the scientific spirit and democratic principles, it recognized and respected the right of individual moral choices, and focused on guiding students to generate the ability of independent moral reasoning and judgmentThis orientation almost dominated the development of modern moral education in the United States in the 20th centuryBut since the 21st century, through the critical reflection on the traditional and modern models of moral education, more and more scholars have realized that the two orientations should not be separated completely, in contrast, the development of moral education should be promoted in the process of the mutual integration of the two orientations Related Articles | Metrics

Select

On the “Four Supports” of Marxist Theory Discipline in the Construction of Ideological and Political Theory Courses——The Initial and Realistic Considerations of the Relationship between Lu Lige, Li Yingxia, Li Huafei 2019, 53 (12):  77-83.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (6290KB) ( )   Providing discipline support for the construction of ideological and political theory courses is an important mission of Marxist theory. Through the construction of Marxist theoretical disciplines, we can not only build a team of ideological and political teachers with high quality for ideological and political theory courses, but also train a group of Marxist scholars who are responsible for the national rejuvenation. It is necessary to carefully consider the reality of the initial construction of the discipline of Marxist theory and the construction of ideological and political theory courses, so as to propose a precise support program. We must provide support for the reserve talents of ideological and political theory courses in the improvement of the training program of Marxist theory subjects. We should provide academic support for theoretical innovation on the basis of cultivating the academic discipline of Marxist theory. We should provide curriculumrelated boutique support in the improvement of the Marxist theoretical subject evaluation system. We should provide platform support for learning exchanges in optimizing the exchange platform of Marxist theoretical disciplines. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

Fact, Theory, Strategy——Baumans Critique of Neoliberal Ideology Tao Rigui1, Tian Qibo2 2019, 53 (12):  84-92.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (7596KB) ( )   Bauman's works in recent years mainly focuses on the theme of postmodernity and mobility, and its essence is to comprehensively criticize neoliberal ideology. This critique is multidimensional, not only the empirical critique of the global level, the polarization of the rich and the poor, the political collapse, the deterioration of the relationship between human beings, but also the liberation of neoliberal ideology, the intensive analysis of the theoretical aspects such as  universalism,  liberation theory,  final conclusion  and  no alternative theory. It also reveals specific strategies such as  turbulence,   simplification,   transformation,  and  freedom  adopted by neoliberal ideology. Bauman's criticism has certain reference and enlightenment significance for Chinas correct understanding and resistance to neoliberal ideology. Related Articles | Metrics

Select

Rationalist Paradigm in International Conflict Research:Debates and Enlightenments Dong Zhuozhuang 2019, 53 (12):  93-107.  DOI: Abstract ( )   PDF (11579KB) ( )   Rationalist paradigm is the dominate paradigms in the field of international conflict research. It is widely used in issues such as interstate conflict, civil war and ethnic conflict. This paradigm focuses on the factors of bilateral interaction between actors, pays attention to the incomplete information, unreliable commitment and issue indivisibility in the bargaining process before the conflict occurs, and explains the failure of bargaining and the occurrence of conflict, thus shaping the research orientation of conflict research with information and commitment as the core. By studying the bargaining process in the shadow of conflict, the rationalist paradigm surpasses the differences in the nature of the disputed issues and emphasizes the interactive nature of national interests, so it has universal significance in interpreting the occurrence of conflict. Rationalist paradigm can be seen as the result of the evolution of conflict research paradigm, which has strong expansibility and operability, and provides feasible ideas for the innovation of middlelevel theory in other fields of IR. As far as the construction of theory itself is concerned, the theorization is relatively high, and the conceptual indicators and logical deduction are clear and concise. Thus it can provide a reference for Chinas theoretical innovation in international relations, that is, empirically observing and innovating concepts while paying attention to the logic and methodology of theory, so that theoretical innovation has more universal practical significance and profound academic value. Related Articles | Metrics