Loading...
主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Table of Content

    16 December 2018, Volume 52 Issue 12 Previous Issue    Next Issue

    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Reform and Opening up Is a Grand New Revolution
    Huang Yibing
    2018, 52 (12):  5-13.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6706KB) ( )  
    Reform and opening up is a grand new revolution. The reason why it is called “revolution” is because the 40 years of reform and opening up have had a tremendous and profound impact on the development, adjustment and improvement of Chinas productivity, production relations, economic base and superstructure. Reform and opening up have greatly liberated and developed productive forces, and laid the most solid material foundation for the advancement and development of Chinese society; it has effectively promoted profound changes in production relations, stimulated the enthusiasm of the people and the enthusiasm for creating wealth; and strongly promoted the superstructure. It has provided a more reliable system guarantee for the countrys prosperity and longterm stability; struggled to open the country and successfully realized the great historical turning from closed or semiclosed to allround opening up. Over the past 40 years, Chinas productive forces, production relations, economic foundations, and profound changes in the superstructure have been the concentrated expression of the great achievements in reform and opening up, and also a prominent symbol of the important contribution of reform and opening up to the development and progress of Chinese society and even human society as a whole.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Fundamental Reasons and Valuable Experience of Chinas Reform and Opening up#br#
    Shen Chuanliang
    2018, 52 (12):  14-21.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6260KB) ( )  
    Over the past 40 years, Chinas reform and opening up has made great achievements that have attracted worldwide attention. Adhering to the leadership of the CPC is the key and fundamental to the success of Chinas reform and opening up. Over the past 40 years of reform and opening up, China has gradually accumulated rich experience, including strategic aspects such as persistence in emancipating the mind, theoretical innovation, etc., as well as positive experiences such as daring to test a policy and then promoting it nationwide. At the same time, it also has negative experiences that are inevitable. The to systematically and comprehensively summarize the positive and negative experiences formed during the reform and opening up process, is conducive to Chinas clearheaded thinking, and truly helps to continue to promote comprehensive deepening of reforms and promote the establishment of a comprehensive open pattern.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Historical Evolution of the Concept of “Reform and Opening up” of the Communist Party of China and the Construction of Discourse#br#
    Hu Guosheng
    2018, 52 (12):  22-29.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6197KB) ( )  
    “Reform and opening up” is a wellknown political concept of Chinese people and has become an important political symbol of the development of contemporary China. The concept of “reform and opening up” is not formed overnight. From the formulation of the “reform” and “opening” policies to the formation and development of the concept of “reform and opening up”, it has experienced “economic reform and opening up to the outside world”, “external opening and invigorating internal economics”, and “invigorating the economy internally”. “Opening up to the outside world”, “reform and opening up”, “opening up to the outside world, opening up to the internal economics”, “economic system reform and opening up to the outside world”, “reform, openness, invigoration”, “allround reform and opening up”, “reform and opening up”. The words have evolved and eventually formed a political concept of “reform and opening up” that has an important influence. The development and evolution of the concept of “reform and opening up” is a historical footnote of the development of contemporary China. It reveals the strong determination and struggle track of the Chinese Communist Partys effort to explore the road to socialism with Chinese characteristics, and highlights the most distinctive features of contemporary Chinas development.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Global Environmental Governance in Xi Jinpings Thought of Ecological Civilization
    Dong Liang
    2018, 52 (12):  30-38.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7032KB) ( )  
    The thought of Xi Jinpings ecological civilization not only indicates the direction of governance for domestic environmental problems, but also provides important concepts for China to participate in global environmental affairs. Its significance inclues: First, Chinas going to promote the fair and reasonable rules of international cooperation and the effectiveness of the international environmental system. Second, China proposes to actively implement the Paris Climate Agreement and the 2030 SDGs, to further demonstrate the determination of a responsible power to maintain multilateralism. Third, China has already had a good interaction with the UN agenda through green “One Belt and One Road” and SouthSouth environment cooperation, and has promoted the implementation of the SDGs in developing countries. Fourth, in future international practice, China will focus on the construction of the discourse of international ecological environment, and to provide more effective public goods and financial assistance. In short, deep participation in global environmental affairs has become an indispensable part of Chinas international strategy.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Identity Politics in Nationstate: Diversity and Ethnic Conflicts
    Liang Xuecun
    2018, 52 (12):  39-48.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7434KB) ( )  
    The postCold War period witnessed an explosion of ethnic conflicts involving recurrent largescale intragroup confrontation within states over political recognition and political power. Even developed societies with the most durable solidarity faced the same challenges. This trend reflects a longterm predicament embedded in the very concept of modernity: how can highly diverse ethnic groups coexist in a positive and productive way under the framework of modern nationstate? How does universality and plurality reconcile in a single policy? To address these two questions, this project firstly scrutinizes the “imported diversity”and its profoundimpacts on identity politics using Britain, France and Australia as cases. The second part reviews the Jewish problem in modern history to reveal the crux of ethnic politics. On the basis of the historical review, the author looks into a paradox of nation building. The conclusion examines the new difficulties of forming and sustaining a stable selfidentityin the global era.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Ludwig Feuerbachs Principle of Space and Karl Marxs Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844#br#
    Wu Meng
    2018, 52 (12):  49-58.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7134KB) ( )  
    Feuerbach criticized Hegel on the basis of the philosophy of Spinoza and put forward the principle of space. Marx applied this principle in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, but some contradictions that cannot be eliminated through the applications of that principle, which provided an opportunity for Marx to criticize thoroughly the philosophy of Feuerbach. From some certain standpoint, this critique was just a critique of the philosophy of Spinoza.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Marxs Concept of Recognition: From Paris Manuscripts to Grundrisse
    Chen Liangbin
    2018, 52 (12):  59-66.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6135KB) ( )  
    Hegels concept of recognition was designed to solve the problem of the possibility of freedom and its implementation.Using mediation of recognition, freedom achieved a realistic possibility through the property rights and its inner links (possess, exchange and labor). Marxs ambition of the recognition theory was the proletariat liberation. Based on the liberation and its realistic goals, while criticizing Hegel and those national economists, Marx advocated to annihilate private property, and to achieve the real recognition on the basis of production relationship, at the mean time to give a fierce criticism to the dissimilation and misrecognition in the civil society. When writing on Grundrisse, Marx realized that the problem of alienation logic held in Paris Manuscripts and Comments on James Mill was the moral judgment to the phenomenon of the civil society, it could not historically solve alienated recognition.Only through the logic of capital, especially the key link of small circulation of capital and labor and so on, can we really catch the essence of alienated recognition and its generation,and fundamentally reveal that the actuality of recognition and liberation of the working class depends on thoroughly breaking the rule of capital.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Forty Years of Introducing Western Economics#br#
    Fang Fuqian
    2018, 52 (12):  67-79.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (9642KB) ( )  
    Since the reform and opening up in 1978, the situation of western economics in China has gone through three different stages: critique, mix of critique and use for reference and applicationoriented. These three stages correspond to Chinas highly centralized planned economy, planned commodity economy and socialist market economy. The need of reform and opening up and economic development has changed the situation of western economics in China. Western economics has become popular from being excluded,from the whole beingnegated to absorb the positive results. In the new era of deepening reform in an allround way, further opening up and building a socialist modernization power, the very difficult and important task that Chines economic circles face will be how to separate scientific component from western economics, which is one of foreign philosophical and social science resources.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    New Challenges of Industrial Organization Theory: Network Externality, Bounded Rationality and Sociality
    Huang Chunchun
    2018, 52 (12):  80-86.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (5354KB) ( )  
    The theory of industrial organization has experienced four stages of development: structure—conduct—performance paradigm (i.e., SCP model), game theory paradigm, network industry organization theory and behavioral industry organization theory. The introduction of game theory enables industrial organization to discuss market structure, behavior and performance problems from the interaction of market participants, thus establishing a solid microeconomic basis for industrial organization. The network industry organization theory further introduces the network externality and the increasing reward mechanism, which makes the theory of industrial organization expand the analysis object to a variety of new organizational forms. But so far, all these theories are sticking to the theoretical core of neoclassical paradigm, and it is difficult to effectively predict the diversification and complexity of industrial organizations in reality. The theory of behavioral industrial organization has made up for the shortcomings of past theories to a certain extent by introducing participants bounded rationality and sociality. But the new theory has not yet been perfectly matched with the past theories. Only by combining network externality with limited rationality and sociality of participants can we create a better theory of industrial organization.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Path Breaking to the Internal Changes of the Welfare State Distribution Regime——Based on the Empirical and Indicator Examination
    Ran Hao
    2018, 52 (12):  87-95.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (7359KB) ( )  
    This article explores the internal changes of the distribution regime in the welfare state reforms in the path breaking approach. It finds that the dualisation exhibits during the welfare state reforms, and the marketization or the privatisation simply occurs in some areas, whilst in some other areas an antimarket phenomenon is concurrently happening, and the government role is also enhancing in the distribution regime, which therefore promotes the function of redistribution of the welfare state. Besides, by setting two variables of the government tax abstraction as well as the government fiscal transfer payment consumption, the enhancement of the redistributive function and the expansion of the government role of welfare states have been verified. Lastly, the article compares the path breaking approach with the path dependence approach in the application of the welfare state reform studies.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    An Analysis of the Influence Factors of Political Party Scale and Its Internal Relations#br#
    Zhou Yun1, Zhang Liang2,Liu Zeyuan3
    2018, 52 (12):  96-103.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )   PDF (6222KB) ( )  
    The strong or weak of a political party power is often closely related to the adjustment and change of its scale. Party scale plays an important role in the development of party organizations. Party scale is affected by multiple factors which are mainly divided into external influence factors and internal influence factors. The internal influence factors include party culture, organizational structure, the rules and regulations, party members, party leaders and so on. The external factors include population, social structure, management technology, political psychology and so on. The internal factors and external factors are interdependent and interact with each other, and a complex, dynamic and open factor system is formed. By taking the influence factor system of party size as the research object, it mainly discusses the various influence factors and their internal relations in that it can provide scientific reference for party to formulate reasonable development plans.
     
    Related Articles | Metrics