Loading...
主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Table of Content

    16 October 2016, Volume 50 Issue 10 Previous Issue    Next Issue

    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    On SunYatsens Thought of Chinese National Revival and Its Historical Position
    Zheng Da-hua
    2016, 50 (10):  5-12.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    The Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation has been the desire and pursuit of the Chinese people in modern history.Mr Sun Yatsen was a great pioneer of the Chinese democratic revolution, and has contributed to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. At the same time, he was also the first person and the author of the Renaissance thought of the Chinese nation. In the process of the formation and development of Chinese national revival thoughts in modern history, Sun Yatsens Chinese Renaissance thought occupies a very important historical position.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Populist Tendency in the Democratic Thought of SunYatsen
    Zuo Yu-he
    2016, 50 (10):  13-19.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    In order to avoid the drawbacks of capitalism in China, SunYatsen put forward the peoples livelihood, hoping that in the backward social environment of China, the ethnic revolution, political revolution and social revolution can be “completed at one battle”. Sun Yatsen tried subjectively to avoid the development of Chinese capitalism and to take on a different way from the capitalist road in the European and American countries. He also tended on socialism. But his ideas on the average rights of land ownership, control of capital and production in favor of socialism has objectively stimulated the development of capitalism in China. The peoples livelihood is not equal to the populist. On the key issue of leaping over the stage of capitalism to socialism, the idea of Sun Yatsens peoples livelihood has in fact showed a strong populist tendency.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    A Macro View of SunYatsens Social and Economic Thought
    Ma Ke-feng
    2016, 50 (10):  20-26.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    孙中山社会经济思想主要包括土地思想、实业发展、节制资本、社会救济等多个方面。土地思想强调通过土地国有、核定地价、涨价归公等方式,最后实现“耕者有其田”;优先发展交通运输,积极开发矿业资源,切实提振民用工业,是其振兴实业的主要内涵;通过节制资本与政府控制,实现均衡发展,避免重蹈欧美覆辙,真正解决社会经济问题是其基本出发点。孙中山社会经济思想主要渊源于其经历,欧美社会经济思想、中国古代经济制度对其思想也有影响。
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Industrialization and the Choice of Socialism
    Cheng Guang-yun
    2016, 50 (10):  27-34.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    Socialism is the historical choice of the people in some countries based on their national conditions. This choice has aninevitable  historical and logical premise, which is the industrialization. The premise of industrialization is the primitive accumulation of capital. The primitive accumulation of capitalism is the plunder while the primitive accumulation of socialism is economy. It is on this premise that some countries, through the socialist transformation, formed the traditional socialism with the planned economy political authority as the characteristics. And then, in order to develop the productive forces of industrialization, the socialist country has formed a modern socialism characterized by market economy and democratic politics. The socialism with Chinese characteristics is not only unique, but also universal. It is not only the primary stage of socialism, but also the transition from the traditional socialism to modern socialism.
    Related Articles | Metrics
     Ideology of Socialist Market Economy——A Proposition Being under Constant Reflection
    Wang Cheng
    2016, 50 (10):  35-42.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    After the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Communist Party of China proposed to let the market play a decisive role in allocation of resources,we must interpret the concept of socialist market economy from a brand new perspective.Socialism and capitalism belong to the second major social form of human beings, and socialism and market economy essentially originate in endogenous relations. The ideologies formed on this basis both contain a complete modern chain and characterize a new form of association between socialism and market economy. Thus, the formation process of “socialist market economy ideology” is the process in which socialism essence continues to appear and continues to mature with the practices of the Communist Party of China.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Marxs Theory of  Substantive Freedom  and Its Reality——A Comparison with Kant
    Chen Xiao-chuan
    2016, 50 (10):  43-49.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    The concept of freedom established by Kant cannot be realized under the condition of modernity. In other words, it has moved to its opposite side—slavery. Marx also called capitalism “modern slavery”. For Marx, the important thing is not to discuss the concept of freedom in a metaphysical way, but to reveal the alienationof of the freedom of people in the capital society which advertises freedom, and to find a practical path of recovering humanity.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Defects of Selection of Exclusive Dominant Policy ofKeynesianism and SupplySide Economics
    Zheng You-gui
    2016, 50 (10):  50-56.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    Both Keynesianism and SupplySide Economics have their own specific historical conditions in their formation. The two schools, on the assumption and the theoretical logic starting point, are opposite. The former takes the demand as the starting point, and the latter takes the supply to create demand as the starting point, which are incompatible with each other. The two schools are taken as the prescription to rescue the economic crisis of capitalism caused by different causes. Their theories and policies advocated in practice have saved the old economic crisis while deriving new economic crisis. The aura of the effect of the two schools in rescuing the crises and the evolution of their revolutionary theories, has obscured the problems in their assumptions, theoretical logic and inconsistent with the reality. In this regard, we should restore their true colors and should not take one single school as the theoretical basis for the selection of exclusive dominant policy of one country.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    An Analysis of Marxist Political Economics on the Structural Reform of Chinas Supply Side
    Han Yan-hong
    2016, 50 (10):  57-64.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    The supply side structural reform is a major innovation in adapting to and leading the New Normal of economic development. It is an imperative measure to promote transformation of economic development mode and the adjustment of economic structure during Chinas “13th FiveYear Plan”. It has an important strategic significance to enhance Chinas international competitive advantage. The theoretical basis of the supply side structural reform should bederived from Marxist political economy, and it is also the development and improvement of Marxist theory of political economy with Chinese characteristics.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    A Review of the Relationship between Secondary Distribution and Economic Growth
    Ran Hao
    2016, 50 (10):  65-70.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    There are two orthodox views on the relationship between the secondary distribution and the economic growth. Firstly, the economic growth fundamentally determines the degree of the secondary distribution.Secondly, the expansion of the secondary distribution hinders the economic growth. Analyzing the two arguments in terms of theoretical contexts and the logic, this paper refutes both two arguments logically as well as empirically, based on which it rather argues  that the secondary distribution may contribute to the economic growth. Identifying the fundamental relation between the secondary distribution and the economic growth is of significance in theory and reality for the recomprehension of the “efficiency priority to equity”.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    G20 in the Vision of Global Energy and Climate Governance
    Qian Xu-ming
    2016, 50 (10):  71-78.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    In the era of globalization, the global energy and climate issues need to be solved through the method of global governance. In recent years, the global energy and climate governance mechanism has been established in the framework of the G20. G20 becomes the global energy infrastructure investment center and global energy and climate management center. China is an important stakeholder and participant in the G20 mechanism and global energy and climate governance. In 2016, China hosts the G20 summit, which gives China an opportunity to lead the toplevel design of global governance. China should play a bigger role in the global energy and climate governance.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Chinas Central Asia Regionalism and the Formation of the Fate Community of Its Neighboring
    Lei Jian-feng
    2016, 50 (10):  79-88.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    Central Aisa is a diplomatic direction which is easier for China to shape strategically and make progress positively. From ‘Shanghai Five to SCO, then to the Silk Road of economic belt, Chinas central Asia strategy is increasingly clear and it reflects the new trend that China hopes to practice good neighborhood policy through promoting regional governance. This strategy has the following characteristics: To provide regional public goods to form a regional cooperation system foundation, To guide the nonstate actors to involve in innovation mechanism to make regionalism and regionalization to enhance each other, to comprehensively distribute strategic resources through a variety of mechanisms and to develop security and development simultaneously, to consider China and the surrounding as fate community and to benefit neighbors with its own development, to cultivate regional community consciousness and the concept of common interests and to build a new regional consciousness and regionalism. Up to now, Chinas central Asian regionalism is forming and to generalize it theoretically is important to Chinas overall foreign policy.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    An Analysis on the Discourse Power of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence——Also on the Development of the Discourse Power of Contemporary Chinas Diplomacy
    Sun Xiao
    2016, 50 (10):  89-95.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    In recent years, with the appearance of a series of diplomatic discourse on the international pattern and global governance, Chinas discourse power in the international community has attracted much attention. This paper tries to put forward an analysis framework from the discourse to the formation of discourse power, and analyzes the generation of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. On this basis, this paper reflects on the current problems of Chinas diplomatic discourse power and sugguests that China should find its own positioning, focus on the inclusiveness and communication capability in the development of diplomatic discourse. At the same time, China should strengthen the practice of discourse, promote and improve the development of Chinas diplomatic discourse system and expand its diplomatic discourse power.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The “Empowerment” Interpretation of Political Science in the Process of Democracy
    Zhao Cheng-fei, Zhu Jun-rui
    2016, 50 (10):  96-102.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    “Empowerment” is the most critical part of a democratic process. The process of democracy is the process of “empowerment”. To keep the “Empowerment” running smoothly, we must rely on a series of principles of open procedures, extensive participation and fair competition and and so on to provide protection and support. At the same time, we also need to promote the “substantive democracy” and “procedural democracy”, the coordination of the mechanism construction, as well as the giving full play of the “effectiveness” and “value” of empowerment system, to provide it institutional support.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Deleuzes  Critique of Capitalism: A PostMarxist Analysis#br#
    Wu Jing
    2016, 50 (10):  103-108.  DOI:
    Abstract ( )  
    Starting with the concept of “desiremachine” in Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Deleuze and Guattari analyze the production relations in distinct societies and reinterpret the inner contradiction of Capitalist logic. Such a new theoretical framework follows the kernel of Marxist political economy while it has succeeded to break the conventional paradigm of production relation in traditional Marxism. Departing from the imbalance between the inner limit and external limit, it provides us an interesting reading of current capitalism with a more contemporary perspective.
    Related Articles | Metrics