Abstract: Constructing an independent knowledge system for the discipline of ideological and political education is both an expression of the discipline's own consciousness in responding to the need to bring out its full potential, and an important part of the practice of accelerating the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics. Around this proposition, the academic community currently presents an overall trend marked by a notable rise in disciplinary consciousness together with the acrosstheboard advance of system construction, the initial formation of a genealogy of concepts together with multidimensional theoretical interpretation, the extensive tapping of resources of all kinds together with a conscious search for cultural roots, the increasingly clear disciplinary boundaries together with the prudent absorption of interdisciplinary resources, and the simultaneous advance of scholarly construction and practical translation. At the level of core issues, researchers have focused on six areas, i.e. examining the disciplines scholarly foundations, clarifying its value implications, reflecting on its essential attributes, analyzing its complex structure, exploring its inner logic, and investigating pathways for its construction, which together define the central problematic of current research. Yet alongside this marked progress, existing research also faces deepseated bottlenecks, including the pressing need to improve the efficiency of knowledge production within the discipline, the insufficient integration of macrolevel structuring with microlevel analysis, the limited depth in uncovering the underlying principles of construction, and the lack of organized collaboration among knowledge producers. To accelerate the advancement toward a systematic and comprehensive  independent knowledge system for the discipline of ideological and political education, it is imperative to adopt holistic thinking, raise disciplinary awareness, adhere to a problem-oriented approach, maintain a creative attitude, and strengthen the building of the academic community, so as to consciously contribute disciplinary wisdom to the process of building a system of knowledge in philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, Chinese style, and Chinese ethos.

Key words: the discipline of ideological and political education, independent knowledge system, disciplinary autonomy, knowledge production, research trends

摘要： 建构思想政治教育学科自主知识体系，既是学科回应内涵式发展需要的内在自觉，也是加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学的重要实践。围绕这一命题，学界目前呈现出学科自觉显著提升与体系建构整体推进、概念谱系初步生成与理论阐释多维展开、各类资源广泛开掘与文化根基自觉探寻、学科边界日益明晰与跨学科资源审慎吸纳、学理建构与实践转化同步推进的总体态势。在核心议题层面，研究者聚焦于学理根基考察、价值意蕴澄明、内涵特性思辨、复杂结构剖析、内在逻辑探析、建构路径探究六个方面，形成了当前研究的核心问题域。然而，既有研究在取得显著进展的同时，亦面临学科知识生产亟须效能化提升、宏观建构与微观分析缺乏系统整合、建构规律揭示不深、建构主体缺乏组织化协同等深层瓶颈。为加快推动思想政治教育学科自主知识体系建构走向系统完善，亟须树立整体性思维、提升学科化意识、坚持问题性导向、秉持创造性态度和加强学术共同体建设，在构建具有中国特色、中国风格、中国气派的哲学社会科学知识体系进程中自觉贡献学科智慧。

关键词: 思想政治教育学科, 自主知识体系, 学科自主性, 知识生产, 研究趋向