Abstract: This paper tries to combine the methods of historical comparison with that of the structurefunction comparison, in order to explore the inner corresponding relations between different party politics and their various political ecologyIt focuses on the points as follows：Since the modernization processes started in different historical periods, the situations of market economic, social diversification and political democratization of different nations are naturally unevenParty politics can only exist concretely in different contexts arising therefore, can only coexist and supplement one another with particular economicsocial life and cultural ideologyParty politics can basically be classified as industrial，transitional and postindustrial onesThere is no best party politics in the world but the least bad onesThe later cannot be found when a specific party politics form mismatches its specific political ecology, such as beyond or behind the particular stage of specific political development  

Key words: party politics , market economy , social consciousness , social structure

摘要： 由于分别是在不同历史时期步入现代化进程，各国经济市场化、社会多元化和政治民主化的广度、深度自然参差不齐。政党政治只能具体地存在于由此而彼此相异的情境中，只能与特定经济、社会生活和文化意识形态发生“互构”关系。世界政党政治基本上可归入后工业社会、转型和新型工业社会、发展中社会的政党政治这么三大范畴。世界上没有“最好的”政党政治。超越或落后于特定发展阶段、与特定政治生态不匹配的政党政治也一定不是“最不坏”的政党政治。  

关键词: 政党政治 , 市场经济 , 社会意识 , 社会结构