Abstract: That subjectivity is a basic idea in Marxist philosophy is questionable and needs to be analyzed. Marx had questioned the internal tendency of contemporary theory of subject and the idea of considering the subject as having grown up from inside. He advocated a re-analysis of the construct and operation of subject against a social background. In his opinion, analyses of the social world and of the subject were closely related, with the subject associated with a practical population it belonged to. The contribution of Marx in this respect, the author points out, lies in the fact that this concept still performs the function of promoting maturity of the rational and paving the way for an ideal objective,and the function of establishing social objectives. The author suggests that the concept of subject has resulted from combination of the rational ego and the internal ego. The adjustment and change Marx made to the contemporary concept of subject had re-established its social foundation. What is more, he introduced the idea of heterogeneity to this concept, expressing concerns with different groupsubject.

Key words: subject, internal growth, sociality groupsubject

摘要： 主体性是马克思主义哲学基本观点的看法应该受到质疑和剖析。马克思质疑了近代主体论向内挖掘、视主体为内在生成的思路,而力主立足于社会世界来重新分析主体的构成和运作方式。这种思路把对社会世界的分析与对主体的分析看作是密切相连的。这种主体与一个共同生活的实践群体相关。马克思对近代主体概念的继承是,这一概念在其理论中仍意味着理性力量不断成长壮大并承担着为理想目标奠定基础、提供手段的功能,也承担了确定社会目标的功能。在目标定向方面,主体概念是理性自我与表现主义的本性表现的内在自我两者融合的结果。马克思对近代主体概念的调整和改变除了重建其社会性根基之外,主要表现为开始把异质性维度引进来,关注不同的群体主体。

关键词: 主体, 内在生成, 社会性, 群体主体