主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Teaching and Research ›› 2022, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 88-98.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Responsiveness in Representative Politics: China in the Comparative Perspective

  

  1. Institute of Political Science, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Online:2022-03-16 Published:2022-03-14

代表回应性的制度实现机制:比较视野与中国模式探析

  

  1. 华东政法大学政治学研究院
  • 作者简介:严行健,华东政法大学政治学研究院副教授(上海201620)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“防范和遏制外部势力利用议会干预香港事务机制研究”(项目号:21CZZ041)的阶段性成果。

Abstract: Responsiveness is vital to representative politics. A general understanding highlights the reelection mechanism in generating the responsiveness in the Western world and its absence in China. The mechanism in the Chinese model emphasizes establishing a “situational sharing” relationship between representatives and voters that encourages a longterm contact between voters and representatives through a series of institutional designs, so as to build an integrated structure based on “situational sharing” and stimulate the responsiveness of representatives. 

Key words: representative politics, representative, responsiveness, Chinese model

摘要: 代表对选民的回应性是代议政治运行的重要保证。在代表回应性的实现机制方面,中西方差异最直接体现于连选连任压力机制的作用。在此基础上,中国机制强调构筑代表与选民间的“情境同构”关系,即通过一系列制度设计使代表与选民保持长期接触,以此产生两者间具有共同生活情境的一体化结构,并激发代表的回应性。而西方机制的核心特征是收益激励。中国模式契合中国政治理念和现实,应予以坚持和完善。

关键词: 代议制, 代表, 回应性, 中国模式