Abstract: The internal relationship between space and capital has always been an important starting point for academics to explore Lefebvre’s and Marx‘s theories of space. Previous studies have focused too much on the homogeneity between Lefebvre‘s and Marx’s theories of space, while to a certain extent ignoring their heterogeneity. From the perspective of heterogeneity, this paper reveals the generating logic of Lefebvre‘s and Marx‘s theories of space, and then explores their ideological contexts and theoretical prospects. It is not difficult to find that the Marxist ideological system contains and develops rich and solid modern space theories. However, to analyze the homogeneity and heterogeneity between the two, we must return to the premise and elaborate the specific connotation of Lefebvre’s theory of production of space, and then clarify the boundary between Lefebvre’s theory and Marx‘s account of space. Therefore, based on the specific connotation of the theory of production of space, this paper reveals that there is obvious heterogeneity between the two at least in three aspects:the narrative form, construction form and power structure of space, thereby presenting a heterogeneous space discourse different from that derived from the homogeneous approach.

Key words: Marx, Lefebvre, the spatialization of capital, the capitalization of space, the production of space

摘要： 空间与资本的内在关系一直是学界探讨列斐伏尔与马克思的空间思想的重要切入点。以往的研究过分侧重于从马克思到列斐伏尔的空间思想做同质性研究，而在一定程度上遮蔽了两者之间的异质性。从异质性研究视角出发，揭示列斐伏尔与马克思的空间思想的生成逻辑，进而梳理出两者的思想脉络和理论图景，不难发现，马克思思想体系蕴藏了丰富而厚实的现代空间思想资源。然而要界定两者的同质性与异质性，就必须回到列斐伏尔空间生产理论的逻辑前提与特定内涵中，进而阐明空间生产理论与马克思空间思想的界分。由此，依据空间生产理论的特定内涵，揭示两者至少在空间的话语形态、建构形式和权力架构三个方面存在着比较明显的异质性，进而呈现一种不同于同质性研究的异质性空间话语。

关键词: 马克思, 列斐伏尔, 资本空间化, 空间资本化, 空间的生产