主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Teaching and Research ›› 2020, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (10): 25-34.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Consideration of the Spatial Dimension of Historical Materialism in The Housing Question

  

  1. School of Marxism,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China
  • Online:2020-10-16 Published:2020-10-09

《论住宅问题》的历史唯物主义空间向度考量

  

  1. 中国人民大学马克思主义学院
  • 作者简介:沈江平,中国人民大学马克思主义学院副教授,中国人民大学21世纪中国马克思主义研究协同创新中心研究员,博士生导师;金星宇,中国人民大学马克思主义学院博士研究生(北京 100872)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系北京市社会科学基金基地一般项目“空间转向:历史唯物主义的一种可能性重释?”(项目号:18JDZXB001)的阶段性成果。

Abstract: In the historical materialist discourse system of critiquing capital logic,the narrative logic of time over space cannot prove the absence of space dimension.With the acceleration of industrialization and urbanization, Housing, which should be the living space of human beings, is painted with a layer of ideology and has been becoming a field of capitalist space production and surplus value extraction. By analyzing social problems such as housing shortages, The Housing Question focused on the private nature of the capitalist social space, the imbalanced social order and the dilemma of human existence under the capitallogic.Based on the four paths of history, structure, criticismand value, the article explains the internal consistency between the residential space form and social development, the organic unity of natural space and social space, the micro perspective of reflecting on capitalist social space and the pursuit of residential harmony and space justice. Revisiting the classics not only helps to deal with the theoretical criticism of the space shortage of historical materialism, but also makes the historical materialist discourse of “production mode” diagnose practical problemsbetter, when responding to the theoretical spatial turn. Besides, it is also conducive to constructing a reasonable spatial order and guaranteeing the reasonable human rights to space resourcesfrom the reality,so as to make the housing return to the essence of living, highlight the social nature of human and realize the survival vision of free and comprehensive development of human beings.

Key words: Engels, The Housing Question, historical materialism, capital logic, spatial turn

摘要: 在历史唯物主义批判资本逻辑的话语体系中,时间优于空间的叙事逻辑不能证明空间向度的缺场。伴随工业化和城市化进程的加快,本应作为人类居住空间的住宅却抹上一层意识形态色彩,日益沦为资本主义空间生产和榨取剩余价值的场域。《论住宅问题》通过分析住宅短缺等社会问题,反观资本主义社会空间的私有本质,以及资本逻辑统治下不平衡的社会秩序和人的生存状态困境。基于历史、结构、批判和价值四重进路,本文对住宅空间形态与社会发展内在一致性、作为自然空间和社会空间有机统一和反思资本主义社会空间的微视角以及寻求居住和谐与空间正义等问题进行阐释。重温经典,既有助于应对历史唯物主义面临空间缺场的理论责难,使历史唯物主义“生产方式”话语在应对理论的空间转向中更好地诊断现实问题;也有利于从现实出发,构建合理的空间秩序,保障人对空间资源的合理享有权利,从而让住宅回归居住本真,彰显人的社会性本质和实现人自由全面发展的生存愿景。

关键词: 恩格斯, 《论住宅问题》, 历史唯物主义, 资本逻辑, 空间转向