David Harveys theory of “intrinsic contradiction in space production” profoundly reveals the inherent contradictions of capitalist space production, which is the contradiction between the mobility of capital and labor in geography and the fixity of space form that in order to achieve this mobility. The mobility of capital and labor defines the fixity of space form, at the same time, the fixity of space form is not only the necessary premise for realizing the mobility of capital and labor, but also an obstacle to its further development. The dailectical in which the two are interdependent andmutually restrictiveis both an important way to solvecapitalist “firstcut”crisis and a deep root cause of the “secondcut” and “thirdcut”crisis of capitalism. To some extent David Harveys theory of “intrinsic contradiction in space production” deepens Marxs theory of capital criticism. However, this theory also has its foundamental limitations, that is, it just reveals the contradiction between spatial relation with space form, points out the fixity of space form will become an obstacle to the further development of the mobility of space relationship, but it doesnt reveal the inherent contradictions of spatial relations itself and the contradiction of social relations which is internalized in the space form.

大卫·哈维的“空间生产内在矛盾论”深刻地揭示了资本主义空间生产的内在矛盾，即资本和劳动在地理上的机动性与为实现这种机动性而采取的空间形式的固定性之间的矛盾。资本和劳动的机动性规定了空间形式的固定性，同时，空间形式的固定性既是实现资本和劳动的机动性的必要前提，又是限制其进一步发展的障碍。二者相互依存、相互制约的辩证法，既是解决资本主义“第一块”危机的重要途径，又是引发资本主义“第二块”和“第三块”危机的深层根源。哈维的“空间生产内在矛盾论”在一定程度上深化了马克思的资本批判理论。然而，这一理论也有其根本局限性，即它仅仅揭示了空间关系与空间形式之间的矛盾，指认空间形式的固定性将成为空间关系的机动性进一步发展的障碍，却没有考察空间关系本身的内在矛盾以及内化于空间形式中的社会关系的内在矛盾。