From Ideology to Intellectual Intervention: The Historical Evolution of the Study of Intellectuals in the Western Academic#br#

Teaching and Research

From Ideology to Intellectual Intervention: The Historical Evolution of the Study of Intellectuals in the Western Academic#br#

Li Yanxia，Deng Li

Department of Political Science, School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005

Online:2018-09-16 Published:2018-10-12

从意识形态到知识介入：当代西方学界知识分子研究视域的历史演变

李艳霞，邓理

厦门大学公共事务学院政治学系

作者简介:李艳霞，厦门大学公共事务学院政治学系教授；邓理，厦门大学公共事务学院政治学系硕士研究生（福建厦门 361005）。
基金资助:
本文系国家社科基金项目“当代中国知识分子政治认同的理论与实证研究”（项目号：17BZZ001）阶段性成果。

Abstract

Abstract:

Due to the historical transition from industrial society to postindustrial society, great changes have taken place in the area of intellectuals. At present, there

are three main dimensions of the definition of Intellectuals: the functionalism, the moral motivation and the field of action. The core of traditional intellectual research is to describe and explain the ideology of intellectuals, which can be divided into two theoretical frameworks: structural analysis and historical tradition analysis. In the background of knowledge society, the focus of intellectual research gradually transfers from consciousness to behavior, paying much attention to the intellectual intervention. The field theory, network analysis and positioning theory all provide rich topics for future research. The transformation of the theme of intellectual research has its economic, social and cultural reasons. Intellectual intervention should be developed in contemporary China.

Key words: intellectuals , ideology , intellectual intervention , analysis approach

摘要：

由于从工业社会到后工业社会的历史转型，国外学界对于知识分子研究的视域及分析路径发生了重大变化。目前，关于知识分子的定义主要存在三种维度：职业功能、心理动机以及行动场域。传统知识分子研究的核心是描述及解释知识分子的意识形态，在影响因素上可归纳为结构分析、历史传统分析两种理论框架。在知识社会背景下，新一轮的知识分子研究重心逐渐从意识转移到行为，关注知识分子的知识介入功能，即如何对社会生活发生作用，产生了场域理论、网络分析、定位理论等分析路径。知识分子研究视域的转变是二战后西方社会经济文化变迁、知识分子群体变化、知识观念转型的综合后果，新的研究视域也为国内外知识分子研究提供了丰富的研究议题。

关键词: 知识分子 , 意识形态 , 知识介入 , 分析路径

Li Yanxia，Deng Li. From Ideology to Intellectual Intervention: The Historical Evolution of the Study of Intellectuals in the Western Academic#br#[J]. Teaching and Research, DOI: .

李艳霞，邓理. 从意识形态到知识介入：当代西方学界知识分子研究视域的历史演变[J]. 《教学与研究》, DOI: .

[1]	Qiu Ji, An Yangchao. Viewing the CPC's Settings of Ideological Issues from the Perspective of “People's Democratic Dictatorship” [J]. Teaching and Research, 2020, 54(4): 5-14.
[2]	Zhang Beiping， Gong Anjing. The Definition, Variables and Path Analysis of Cultural Intervention [J]. Teaching and Research, 2020, 54(4): 88-95.
[3]	Ni Shoupeng . Morality, Ideology, Historical Materialism——Taking Kay Nelson's Marxism and the Moral Point of View as the Starting Point [J]. Teaching and Research, 2020, 54(1): 104-112.
[4]	Xue Ji. On Eagleton's Expansion of Ideology in German Ideology [J]. Teaching and Research, 2019, 53(9): 91-97.
[5]	Liu Boya, Li Jinyu. The Identification Logic of Mainstream Ideology in Cyberspace#br# [J]. Teaching and Research, 2019, 53(4): 98-104.
[6]	Geng Huamin,Fang Ying. The Identification Logic of Mainstream Ideology in Cyberspace [J]. Teaching and Research, 2019, 53(4): 105-112.
[7]	Zhao Ziyu. A Discuss on the Issue of Using International MOOC to Enhance International Discourse Power [J]. Teaching and Research, 2019, 53(3): 95-104.
[8]	Tao Rigui1, Tian Qibo2. Fact, Theory, Strategy——Baumans Critique of Neoliberal Ideology [J]. Teaching and Research, 2019, 53(12): 84-92.
[9]	Shen Jiangping. The Ideology of Culture and the Culture of Ideology [J]. Teaching and Research, 2018, 52(3): 68-74.
[10]	Liu Tongfang1, Shi Yingzhe2. Through Illusion: Zizeks Ideological Criticism and His Attitude of Liberation [J]. Teaching and Research, 2018, 52(11): 75-80.
[11]	Zheng Jie. Opportunities, Challenges and Countermeasures for Chinas Ideological Security in the Era of Big Data [J]. Teaching and Research, 2017, 51(11): 61-68.
[12]	Shen Jiang-ping. Three Aspects of Contemporary Ideology [J]. Teaching and Research, 2016, 50(8): 5-12.
[13]	Li Qing-hua, Li Zhi-fei. On the Discourse Power of Ideological and Political Education [J]. Teaching and Research, 2016, 50(7): 89-94.
[14]	Liu Qu-zhi, Sun Qi-ang. Rethinking of the Concept of “Thought” in the Ideological and Political Education [J]. Teaching and Research, 2016, 50(6): 78-84.
[15]	Kuai Zheng-ming. An Analysis of Mannheims Theory of Ideology [J]. Teaching and Research, 2016, 50(6): 96-104.