Abstract: Hegels concept of recognition was designed to solve the problem of the possibility of freedom and its implementation.Using mediation of recognition, freedom achieved a realistic possibility through the property rights and its inner links (possess, exchange and labor). Marxs ambition of the recognition theory was the proletariat liberation. Based on the liberation and its realistic goals, while criticizing Hegel and those national economists, Marx advocated to annihilate private property, and to achieve the real recognition on the basis of production relationship, at the mean time to give a fierce criticism to the dissimilation and misrecognition in the civil society. When writing on Grundrisse, Marx realized that the problem of alienation logic held in Paris Manuscripts and Comments on James Mill was the moral judgment to the phenomenon of the civil society, it could not historically solve alienated recognition.Only through the logic of capital, especially the key link of small circulation of capital and labor and so on, can we really catch the essence of alienated recognition and its generation,and fundamentally reveal that the actuality of recognition and liberation of the working class depends on thoroughly breaking the rule of capital.

Key words: Hegel , Marx , recognition , alienation , capital

摘要： 黑格尔的承认概念旨在解决自由及其实现的可能性问题，借助承认中介，自由通过财产权及其内在环节（占有、交换与劳动）走向一种现实化的可能。马克思承认理论的抱负则在于无产阶级解放，围绕着解放及其现实化的目标，在批判黑格尔和国民经济学的同时，马克思主张扬弃私有财产，实现生产交往基础上的真正的承认，同时对市民社会中的异化及其承认现象予以激烈批判。进入《大纲》的写作之后，马克思意识到《巴黎手稿》及其《穆勒评注》所持的异化逻辑停留在表象的价值评判上，不能历史地解开异化承认的症结，只有通过资本的逻辑，尤其是资本与劳动的“小流通”等关键环节，才能真正抓住异化承认生成问题及其本质，从而在根本上揭示工人阶级解放及其承认的现实化必须建立在彻底打破资本统治的基础上。

关键词: 黑格尔 , 马克思 , 承认 , 异化 , 资本