国际关系法兰克福学派批判理论的思想来源及研究理路

《教学与研究》 ›› 2009, Vol. ›› Issue (9): 70-78.DOI:

国际关系法兰克福学派批判理论的思想来源及研究理路

阎静

江苏大学人文学院, 江苏, 镇江, 210013

收稿日期:2009-06-13 出版日期:2009-09-20 发布日期:2012-03-06
基金资助:
江苏省教育厅高校哲社科研究项目“国际关系规范理论研究”(项目编号:07SJD810001)阶段性研究成果

The Frankfurt School Critical Theory in IR:Origins and Academic Route

YAN Jing

School of Humanities, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 210013, China

Received:2009-06-13 Online:2009-09-20 Published:2012-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 法兰克福学派国际关系批判理论最直接的思想来源是法兰克福批判社会理论。20世纪80年代初国际关系"批判转向"的主要理论家都深受其影响。如今该学派虽不再代表国际关系理论中对正统观点的最主要挑战,但仍然是后实证主义理论中极具影响的流派之一。迄今为止,该流派研究议题十分宽泛。本文从规范的、社会学和人类行为学三大维度对该流派的发展进行梳理。保持普世主义特征,围绕排斥、对话、差异、苦难和伤害等主题尝试重建现代性方案和探究政治共同体新形式是该流派的总体研究理路。

关键词: 法兰克福学派批判社会理论, 国际关系法兰克福学派批判理论, 规范性, 社会学, 人类行为学

Abstract: The direct origin of the Frankfurt school’s IR critical theory is the Frankfurt critical social theory.Major IR theorists in the early 1980s were heavily influenced by this thought.Although this school of thought no longer stands for the most important challenge to the mainstream IR theories,it is still among the most influential schools of positivist theories.Up till now,the research themes of that school is of a large scope.This paper attempts to offer a discussion of the development of the Frankfurt school in IR from the normative,sociological and praxeological domains.The general theoretical route of that school is to maintain the features of universalism and explore new forms of political community by analyzing such themes as exclusion,discourse,difference,suffer and harm.

Key words: the Frankfurt school’s critical theory, the Frankfurt school’s critical theory in IR, normative, sociology, praxeology

中图分类号:

阎静. 国际关系法兰克福学派批判理论的思想来源及研究理路[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2009, (9): 70-78.

YAN Jing. The Frankfurt School Critical Theory in IR:Origins and Academic Route[J]. Teaching and Research, 2009, (9): 70-78.

参考文献

[1] David Held.Introduction to Critical Theory:From Horkheimer to Habermas[M].Berkeley and Los Angeles,CA:University of California Press,1980.
[2] R.Cox.Social Force,States and World Order:Beyond International Relations Theory[J].Millennium,1981,(10).
[3] R.Ashley.Political Realism and Human Interests[J].International Studies Quarterly,1981,(25).
[4] A.Linklater.Beyond Realism and Marxism:Critical Theory and International Relations[M].New York:St.Martin Press,1989.
[5] A.Linklater.Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations[M].London:Macmillan,1982.
[6] A.Linklater.The Transformation of Political Community:Ethical Foundations of the Postwestphalian Era[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1998.
[7] Richard Wyn Jones.Introduction:Locating Critical International Relations Theory[A].in Richard Wyn Jones(ed.).Critical Theory and World Politics.[C].London:Lynne Rienner Publishers,Inc.,2001.
[8] Nicholas Rengger,Ben Thirkell-White.Still Critical After All These Years? The Past,Present and Future of Critical Theory in International Relations[J].Review of International Studies,2007,(33).
[9] A.Linklater.The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory:A CriticalTheoretical Point of View[J].Millennium,1992,(22).
[10] M.Hoffman.Critical Theory and the interparadigm Debate[J].Millennium,Vol.16,No.2,1987.
[11] J.M.Bernstein.Recovering Ethical Life:Habermas and the Future of Critical Theory[M].London:Methuen,1995.
[12] David Couzens Hoy,Thomas McCarth.Critical Theory[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1994.
[13] Kenneth Baynes.Deliberative Politics,the Public Sphere,and Global Democracy[A].in Richard Wyn Jones(ed.).Critical Theory and World Politics[C].London:Lynne Rienner Publishers,Inc.,2001.
[14] Richard Rorty.Contingency,Irony and Solidarity[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1989.
[15] Habermas.The Past as Future[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1994.
[16] A Linklater.The Changing Contours of Critical International Relations Theory[A].in R.Wyn Jones (ed.).Critical Theory and World Politics[M].LoneontLynne Reinner,2001.
[17] Andrew Linklater.The Harm Principle and Globlal Ethics[J].Global Society,VoL 20,No.3,July 2006t Andrew Linklater.Towards a Sociology of Global Morals with an "Emancipatory Intent"[J].Review of International Studies,2007,(33).
[18] R.Cox,Timothy Sinclair.Approaches to World Order[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
[19] M.Cochran.International Ethics as Pragmatic Critique:Confronting the Epistemological Impasse of the Cosmopolitan/Communitatian Debate[Z].Ph.D.dissertation,University of London,1996:Anthony Giddens.The nationstate and Violence[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1985.
[20] W.Wallace.Truth and Power,Monks and Technocrats:Theory and Practice in International Relations[J].Review of International Studies,1996,22(3).
[21] Raymond Aron.Peace and War:A Theory of International Relations[M].London:Weidenfeld and Nicholson,1966.
[22] D.Arehibugi.From the United Nations to Cosmopolitan Democracy[A].in D.Archibugi,D.Held(eds.).Cosmopolitan Democracy[C].Cambridge:Polity Press,1995.
[23] D.Bohler.Transcendental Pragmatics and Critial Morality.On the Possibility and Moral Significance of a Self-Enlightenment of Reason[A].in Seyla Benbib,Fred Dallmayl (eds.).The Communicative Ethics Controversy[C].Cambridge:MIT Press,1990.
[24] A.Linklater.Distant Suffering and Cosmopolitan Obligations[J].International Politics,2007,(44).