主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

《教学与研究》 ›› 2012, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 15-21.DOI:

• 当代中国社会发展研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家综合防灾减灾的体制性障碍
与改革取向

 应松年, 林鸿潮   

  1. 中国政法大学 法治政府研究院
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-02 出版日期:2012-06-20 发布日期:2012-06-29
  • 作者简介:应松年,中国政法大学终身教授,中国法学会行政法学研究会会长,国家减灾委专家委员会委员,主要研究方向为行政法学;林鸿潮,中国政法大学副教授,应急法研究中心执行主任,法学博士,主要研究方向为行政法学、公共应急管理。

Institutional Barriers and Reform Orientation of Comprehensive
National Disaster Prevention and Mitigation

 YING  Song-Nian, LIN  Hong-Chao   

  1. Institute of Government by Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing
  • Received:2012-05-02 Online:2012-06-20 Published:2012-06-29

摘要: 2003年以来,中国的防灾减灾体制采取了一系列改革措施,但并不彻底,在现阶段还面临再次改革的任务。改革的核心是促进防灾减灾资源和能力的有效整合,实现政府防灾减灾职责和权力的明晰一致。本文主张,应当重构政府与市场、社会的关系以建立多元化的防灾减灾组织体系,彻底解决公共部门之间的“条块关系”,理顺纵向与横向的府际关系,建立防灾减灾的日常管理机构,实现灾害应急决策指挥机构与现场指挥机构的合理分工。

关键词: 防灾减灾 , 体制性障碍 , 再改革

Abstract: Since 2003, Chinas disaster prevention and mitigation system has adopted a series of reform measures. But this has not been done thoroughly. At the present stage, this system is still in need of further reform. The key to this reform is promoting effective integration of resources for and competence of disaster prevention and mitigation, and realizing consistency of the governments duties and powers in disaster prevention and mitigation. The article argues that relationships among the government, the market and the society should be restructured in order to set up a diversified organization system of disaster prevention and mitigation. In this way, problems caused by the so-called “tiaokuai relation (barrier relation)”among public sectors can be solved, and both inter and intra relations within the government can be straightened out. A standing management organization should be established to attend to regular affairs of disaster prevention and mitigation, and a rational division of the jobs of emergency response decision command structure and the field command structure should be realized.

Key words: disaster prevention and mitigation , institutional barriers , further reform