制度创新:风险与选择

《教学与研究》 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (7): 30-33.DOI:

制度创新:风险与选择

陈忠¹, 任旭刚²

1. 苏州大学哲学系, 江苏苏州215021;
2. 中国人民大学哲学系, 北京100872

收稿日期:2004-11-28 出版日期:2005-07-20 发布日期:2012-03-05
基金资助:
国家社科基金项目“全球化背景下的马克思主义规则论”;江苏省教育厅基金项目“规则理论:思想资源与存在论基础”的阶段性成果(项目批准号:03CZX002)

Institutional Innovation: Risks and Options

CHEN Zhong¹, REN Xu-gang²

1. Department of Philosophy, Suzhou University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215021, China;
2. Department of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2004-11-28 Online:2005-07-20 Published:2012-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全球性风险社会背景下,对制度创新进行风险研究,对更加自觉、合理推进制度创新意义重大。在制度创新与风险的关系中,一方面,制度创新是对风险的应对、规避、化解,风险是激发人们进行制度创新的重要动因;另一方面,制度创新本身又存在风险,可能使风险放大、总体化。在制度创新与风险的辩证互动中,发展是制度创新的目的,生存是制度创新的底线,整体存在、整体能力的可持续是制度创新的根本原则。

关键词: 制度创新, 风险社会, 主体选择

Abstract: On the one hand, institutional innovation is meant to cope with, avoid, and eliminate risks. Thus, risks can provide important motives for innovation. On the other hand, institutional innovation can be risky, and it may lead to more extended and more serious risks. In this sense, the relationship between institutional innovation and risks should be dialectic and interactive, with development as the ultimate goal. The baseline of institutional innovation is survival, and the basic principles for institutional innovation are to ensure existence and sustainable competence as a whole.

Key words: institutional innovation, society with risks, subject choice

中图分类号:

D033

陈忠, 任旭刚. 制度创新:风险与选择[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2005, (7): 30-33.

CHEN Zhong, REN Xu-gang. Institutional Innovation: Risks and Options[J]. Teaching and Research, 2005, (7): 30-33.

[1]	冯志宏. 风险社会视域下全人类共同价值省思[J]. 教学与研究, 2022, 56(9): 104-112.
[2]	张成福, 陈占锋, 谢一帆. 风险社会与风险治理[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2009, (5): 5-11.
[3]	孟祥青. “9·11”事件对我国国家安全的重大启示[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2002, (3): 19-24.
[4]	唐绍欣, 李增刚. 熊彼特的制度经济思想及其与马克思的比较[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2001, (3): 31-36.