哥本哈根学派复合安全理论的修正和演进

《教学与研究》 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 89-96.DOI:

• 思潮评介 • 上一篇

哥本哈根学派复合安全理论的修正和演进

高峻

北京大学国际关系学院, 北京100871

收稿日期:2005-06-20 出版日期:2005-10-20 发布日期:2012-03-05

Revision and Progress of Security Complex Theory by the Copenhagen School

GAO Jun

School of International Relations, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2005-06-20 Online:2005-10-20 Published:2012-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以巴瑞.布赞和奥利.维夫为代表的欧洲安全研究——哥本哈根学派是活跃在国际安全研究领域的一支重要力量,他们由于提出了著名的“复合安全理论”而成为近些年欧洲安全研究领域中最为显赫的流派。本文首先将简要介绍“复合安全理论”提出的背景和理论演进过程;其后分析“古典复合安全理论”、“超越古典复合安全理论”以及后来的“地区复合安全理论”的内容和特点,以试图勾勒出其较完整的理论框架;文章的最后部分将对“复合安全理论”进行评论与分析。

关键词: 哥本哈根学派, 复合安全理论, 安全复合体

Abstract: The Copenhagen School with its researches on European security represented by Barry Buzan and Ole Waever has been active in the field of international security and has made a lot of contributions.They became a most influential school because of their well-known Security Complex Theory(SCT).This paper is meant to outline a complete theoretical framework of The SCT.It begins with a brief introduction to the background and historical evolution of The SCT,followed by analyses of the themes and characteristics of the Classical Security Complex Theory(CSCT),the Transcendental Classical Security Complex Theory,and the Regional Security Complex Theory with the intention of arriving at a general framework of the theory.At the end of the paper comments and analysis of the Security Complex Theory are offered.

Key words: the Copenhagen School, Security Complex Theory, the security complex

中图分类号:

D815

高峻. 哥本哈根学派复合安全理论的修正和演进[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2005, (10): 89-96.

GAO Jun. Revision and Progress of Security Complex Theory by the Copenhagen School[J]. Teaching and Research, 2005, (10): 89-96.

参考文献

[1] Barry Buzan. People , States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations[M]. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1983.
[2] Richard W. Jones. Security, Strategy and Critical Theory[M]. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1999.
[3] 巴瑞·布赞等.新安全论[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2003.
[4] Barry Buzan. A Framework for Regional Security Analysis[A]. Barry Buzan , Growher Rizvi, eds. South Asian Insecurity and the Great Powers [C]. London: Croom Helm,1986.
[5] 郑先武."安全复合体"与区域秩序建构:一种理论阐释[J].欧洲研究,2004,(3).
[6] 罗天虹.哥本哈根学派的安全理论评析[J].教学与研究,1999,(8).
[7] Barry Buzan , Ole Waever. Regions and Powers[M]. Boulder London:Lynne Rienner Publisher, 2003.
[8] David A. Lake , Patrick M. Morgan. The New Regionalism in Security Affairs [A]. David A.Lake , Patrick M. Morgan, eds.. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World[C]. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
[9] Jounne Wright. Northern Ireland-A British Isles Security Complex[J]. Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 5, No. 4 Winter 1993.
[10] Amitav Acharya. The Periphery as the Core:The Third World and Security Studies[A].Keith Krause, Michael C. Williams, eds..Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases[C]. Minneapolic: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
[11] Bjorn Hettne ,Fredrik Sderbaum. Theorising the Rise of Regionness[A]. Shaun Breslin,Christopher W. Hughes, et al, eds.. New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy[C]. London: Routledge, 2002.
[12] Bill McSweeney. Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[13] 克雷德·斯奈德等.当代安全与战略[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2001.
[14] Steve Smith. The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years[A]. Stuart Croft, Terry Terriff, eds.. Critical Reflections on Security and Change[C]. London: Frank Cass, 2000.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

2282

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	2282

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	85	2197
比例	4%	96%

摘要

1394

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	1394

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	119	1275
比例	9%	91%

哥本哈根学派复合安全理论的修正和演进

Revision and Progress of Security Complex Theory by the Copenhagen School

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

[1]	孙云飞1，刘昌明2. “印太”地区安全复合体的形成与美国霸权护持[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2019, 53(12): 36-47.
[2]	吴志成, 杨娜. 北欧的国际关系研究评析[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (10): 82-88.