主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Search Result

    Search within results Open Search
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    The Evolution of World History and the Global Significance of China's Opening-up to the World
    Lei Da, Chen Liang
    Teaching and Research    2024, 58 (11): 54-69.  
    Abstract314)      PDF(pc) (13368KB)(46)       Save
    Based on the analysis of productive forces, modes of production, and relations of production, Marx's theory of world history explains the driving force behind the transition of the process of history to that of world history, and elaborates the direction and purpose of the evolution of world history. The formation of world history follows the development law from particularity to universality. This paper applies Marxs theory of world history to dialectically show the phased challenges and opportunities of capitalist modernization development. Chinas highlevel institutional openingup to the world will inevitably maintain necessary resilience and tension between basing itself on Chinas specific realities and conforming to the trend of world history, and between upholding independence and drawing on the achievements of human civilization, especially the modernization of capitalism. In this way, we can deeply grasp Chinas centurylong journey from a semifeudal and semicolonial society, which was forced to integrate into the periphery of world history, to national independence, reform and openingup, and constantly demonstrate the contemporary significance in which China transcends the “SovietEastern model” and the “East Asian model”, moves towards national rejuvenation, approaches the center of world history and creates a new world history. All these provide answers to the question of whether the backward socialist “isolated island” can be built in the “vast ocean” of capitalism with the practice of the Chinese path to modernization.

    Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
    The Second Generation of International Political Economy’s Background Characteristics and Theories Beyond
    LEI Da, SUN Zhong-dong
    Teaching and Research    2010, (1): 51-58.  
    Abstract1282)      PDF(pc) (2199KB)(1732)       Save
    Since the 1990s,a large number of anomalies caused by the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the deepening of globalization have not only challenged the first IPE theory,but also become the breeding ground of the second generation of IPE theory.In this context,compared with the first generation of IPE theory,the second generation of IPE theory has get beyond at assumptions,research ideas and participators in the globalization,theoretical perspectives and methods of analysis,etc.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
    Evolution of Financial Development Policies in Developing Countries
    YU Chun-hai, LEI Da
    Teaching and Research    2006, (1): 43-48.  
    Abstract1089)      PDF(pc) (901KB)(1650)       Save
    The author observes that Washington agreement has gradually evolved to post-Washington agreement which emphasizes factors outside the financial system,even outside the economic system.The ultimate criterion for judging whether the financial market maintains advantages in efficiency is whether it leads to increasing savings and capital at home.In an open economy this advantage is reflected by the results of comparison with other countries.To be more specific,it refers to comparison of efficiency by examining both the market aspects and non-market aspects within a country with the equivalent aspects in other countries.Therefore,in the financial development it is natural to emphasize the complementary relation between the government and the market.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
    Relation between Western Institutional Economicsand Orthodox Economics
    Lei Da, Hu Shuguang
    Teaching and Research    1998, (9): 50-54.  
    Abstract1067)      PDF(pc) (597KB)(1428)       Save
    Institutional economics, once regarded as heterodoxy by orthodox economics and then applied in or thodox economics to analyze the system, has in fact or iginat ed in ortho dox economics. It used to be against or thodo xeconomics, but later returned to orthodox economics and formed a research norm of analyzing economic issues from theperspective of uncertainty in the system. There are differences between institutional economics and orthodox economics in research subjects and resear chmethods, which lead to conflicts between the two. These conflicts are reflected in t he former 's criticism of the latter , including disapproval of its longterm and shortterm meanings,objection to its method of model analysis, revision of some of its concepts and its unreal premises of hypothesis, andopposition to its policy o f laissezfaire as well.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
  Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords