Abstract: Despite the longstanding enthusiasm within the mainstream academia, global governance is facing increasing practical challenges. Western global governance theories are embedded in the liberal political system, with imperialism being the fundamental driving force behind its formation. However, in the face of the lack of stateness that is prevalent in developing countries, scholars have prescribed a remedy of “denationalization”. From this perspective, the crisis in Western global governance theories stems from their inherent theoretical hardcore, which makes it difficult to address the issues fundamentally at the institutional or policy levels. In stark contrast, Chinas advocacy of the vision of a community of shared future for mankind offers a new solution for global governance. It not only breaks free from the shackles of Westerncentric world order, but also provides a platform for less developed nations to pursue modernization.

Key words: world politics, global governance, imperialism, stateness, a community of shared future for mankind

摘要： 虽然主流学界长期以来报以极大热忱，但全球治理却在实践层面日渐遭遇困局。西方全球治理理论内嵌于自由主义世界政治体系，帝国主义是推动这一秩序形成的根本动力。而面对发展中国家普遍存在的国家性缺失问题，学者们却开出了“去国家化”的药方。由此观之，西方全球治理理论的危机源自其自身的理论“硬核”，这种“基因缺陷”导致任何制度或政策层面的改善都难以在根本上解决问题。与此形成鲜明对比，中国倡导的人类命运共同体为全球治理提供新的方案，它不仅突破了西方中心主义世界秩序的桎梏，同时为落后国家追逐现代化提供了舞台。

关键词: 世界政治学, 全球治理, 帝国主义, 国家性, 人类命运共同体