Abstract: With the philosophical turn, Marx and Whitehead as the modern and contemporary thinkers, they both turn their philosophical perspectives to the actual world and seek experiential basis of their philosophies, moreover they end traditional metaphysics and philosophy of consciousness by dialectical thinking, process thinking as well as holism and organism They no longer analyze “things” as substance and selfconsciousness as subject, but analyse the existent activities of actual human beings and their process of life or the activities of feelings and prehensions of actual entities and occasions, and try to answer subject in the environment how selfbecoming, selfactualizing, and selfliberating according to the principle of subjectivity, and how to realize cosmic order and human civilization by intersubjectivity In that sense the philosophies of Marx and Whitehead are rooted in theory of perceptual activities in the actual world, although their core categories are different, Marx emphasizes labor, production and practice for the actual human beings but Whitehead investigates feelings, prehensions, becoming and creation of actual entities They not only let noun verbalization, from “hermeneutics of practice” to the “critique for pure feelings”, but also focus on the interaction between subject and object, communication of intersubjectivity There are many commonalities on the philosophies of Marx and Whitehead, such as, intersubject communication and the relationship between prehending and prehended are all based on subjectobject interaction under the practical dialectics and process dialectics of perceptual activities; subjects and objects are all objective realities; and theories of perceptual activities are set up in the historical logic and process perspective, etc Thus, these views are important for highlighting the interpretative principle of historical materialism

Key words: Marx, Whitehead, theory of perceptual activities, commonality

摘要： 伴随哲学的转向，作为现当代思想家的马克思与怀特海都把哲学目光投向现实世界，并寻求哲学的经验基础，在辩证思维、过程思维与整体论、有机论立场下，终结了传统形而上学、意识哲学。他们不再分析作为实体、本体的“物”、作为主体的自我和自我意识，而是分析现实的人之生存活动及生活过程、现实实有和事态的感受、摄入活动，立足主体性原则，回答主体如何在环境中自我生成、实现自身、获得解放；依循主体间性探究宇宙秩序、人类文明何以可能。在这个意义上说，他们都经历了从“反”——批判与解构到“返”——回归感性现实的理论重建的思想历程。尽管马克思与怀特海哲学使用的核心概念不同，前者强调现实的人之劳动、生产、实践，后者则考察现实实有的感受、摄入、生成、创造，但其哲学都是植根于感性活动论，不仅将名词动词化，从“实践解释学”进展到“纯粹感受批判”，而且关注“主客体”相互作用与“主体间性”的交往等，在诸多方面具有共通性。在两位那里，无论是主体间的交往还是相互摄入关系都必须建立在主客体相互作用这一感性活动的实践辩证法和过程辩证法的理解之上，主体和认识、实践的对象——客体、环境都是客观实在，并从历史的逻辑和过程视野确立感性活动这一最基本的理论维度。这无疑有助于凸显马克思基于历史唯物主义解释原则的哲学革命。

关键词: 马克思, 怀特海, 感性活动论, 共通性