主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Teaching and Research ›› 2025, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 28-38.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Communication and Integration, Value Engagement, Practical Configuration: Three Rational Pathways to Upholding the Subjectivity of Chinese Culture in the New Era

  

  1. 1.School of Philosophy, and School of Marxism, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shanxi 710127, China; 
    2. School of Marxism, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shanxi 710127, China
  • Online:2025-04-15 Published:2025-04-17
  • About author:胡军良,西北大学哲学学院教授、西北大学马克思主义学院博士生导师;卞敏,西北大学马克思主义学院博士研究生(陕西 西安710127)。

交往融通·价值关涉·实践构型:新时代中华文化主体性坚守的三重理性进路

  

  1. 1  西北大学哲学学院、西北大学马克思主义学院;  2  西北大学马克思主义学院。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社科基金重大项目“人民至上与唯物史观新发展研究”(项目号:23&ZD016)、陕西省哲学社会科学研究中心“哲学社会科学研究项目”(项目号:2024YB002)的阶段性成果。

Abstract: The rational approach to upholding the cultural subjectivity of Chinese civilization in the new era is inherently intertwined with communicative and integration, value engagement, and practical configuration. Communicative rationality manifests in addressing the dialectic of tradition and modernity, the distinction between the East and the West, the dispute over essence and utility, the integration of ancient and contemporary wisdom, the convergence of Eastern and Western thought, and the unity of ontology and practice. Regarding the value core, consensus and standard, the refinement of values via reasoning for statecraft, embodying righteousness in life and achieving internal transcendence, as well as the shaping of values through peace and development, fairness and justice, and democracy and freedom, along with the consideration of values such as ecological harmony, humanistic care, and shared beauty in diversity, underscores the path to value rationality. In addressing local issues, proposing local solutions, and establishing local paradigms, practical rationality emerges through cultural responses to historical authenticity, contemporary issues, and future inquiries, the practical consciousness of cultural selfreflection, cultural agency, and cultural confidence, and the accumulation of experiences in symbolic regeneration, formal innovation, and paradigm reconstruction.


Key words: the new era, subjectivity of Chinese culture, communicative rationality, value rationality, practical rationality

摘要: 新时代中华文化主体性坚守的理性进路,与交往融通、价值关涉、实践构型密不可分。在古今之辩、中西之别、体用之争上,传统与现代的融通、东方与西方的会通、本体与工夫的贯通,彰显了其交往理性进路。在价值内核、价值共识、价值尺度上,穷理经世、生以载义与内在超越的价值淬炼,和平发展、公平正义与民主自由的价值凝塑,生态和谐、人本关照与美美与共的价值考量,凸显了其价值理性进路。在本土问题、本土方案、本土范型上,历史之实、当代之题与未来之问的文化应答,文化自省、文化自为与文化自信的实践自觉,符号创生、形态更新与范式再造的经验积淀,昭显了其实践理性进路。


关键词: 新时代, 中华文化主体性, 交往理性, 价值理性, 实践理性