Abstract: The relationship between Foucault and Marx remains a contentious issue, characterized by both their close connections and theoretical divergences, further complicated by Foucaults own contradictory and ambiguous statements on the matter. On one hand, Foucault explicitly denied being a Marxist, yet he frequently referenced—often without explicit attribution—Marxs concepts and methodologies. On the other hand, he claimed that his genealogy of power originated from Marx, particularly from the second volume of Capital, though he never provided a detailed theoretical elaboration. This paper begins with Foucaults explicit acknowledgment of the second volume of Capital to explore the intellectual course from Capital to the genealogy of power, thereby clarifying the theoretical relationship between Foucault and Marx. The discussion focuses on three key issues: first, Foucaults theoretical distinction between Marx and Marxism; second, the theoretical linkage between the second volume of Capital and Foucault's genealogy of power; and third, the  prospects of the theories of Foucault and Marx in the era of digital capitalism.

Key words: critique of capitalism, Capital, genealogy of power, capital power, knowledge power

摘要： 福柯与马克思的关系是一个充满争议性的问题。争议在于福柯与马克思之间既有密切联系又有观点排斥，而且福柯对此还留下了许多相互矛盾和晦暗不明的表述。他一方面强调自己不是一个马克思主义者，但是又经常标明引用或者大量不标明引用马克思的观点方法；另一方面他提出他的权力谱系学是从马克思出发的，尤其是从《资本论》第二卷出发的，然而又没有给出具体展开的理论说明。本文将从福柯对于《资本论》第二卷的明确认定出发，探讨从《资本论》到权力谱系学的思想逻辑，由此深入梳理福柯与马克思的理论关系，为此聚焦三个问题：一是福柯对于马克思和马克思主义的理论区分；二是关于《资本论》第二卷与福柯权力谱系学的理论连接；三是福柯与马克思的理论在数字资本主义时代的前景。

关键词: 资本主义批判, 《资本论》, 权力谱系学, 资本权力, 知识权力