Abstract: The development of modern economics is based on the consilience of knowledge, especially consilience of diachronic knowledge of the discipline. The diachronic disciplinary knowledge provides a more focused research perspective, historical background, analytical tools, and shows the basic trajectory of its theoretical development. However, the teaching material of modern economics puts the diachronically developing theory in a homochronous frame, which removes the epoch, subjectivity and particularity of the theory and leaves only the technologic framework without humanistic thought. The author concludes that rescanning the growth of the economic thought will enable us to give it a more effective and overall examination, become more aware of the temporality of “mainstream” doctrine, and more effectively get rid of the shackles of mainstream paradigms.

Key words: consilience , history of economic thought , diachronism , homochronism , mainstream and non-mainstream

摘要： 现代经济学的发展需要建立在知识契合的基础之上，并首先要对历时性知识作学科内的契合；究其原因，学科内的历时性知识提供了更为集中的研究视角、历史背景以及分析工具，提供了理论深化的基本轨迹。然而，现代经济学教材却将历时性演化的理论放在同一个共时性的平面框架中，从而抽去了理论的时代性、主观性和特殊性，而留下一堆没有人文思维的技术性骨架。因此，重新梳理思想史的发展，我们可以更好地对经济学科进行全面审视，更好地认识那些“主流”学术的暂时性，从而更好地摆脱主流范式的束缚。

关键词: 契合 , 经济思想史 , 历时性 , 共时性 , 主流和非主流