主管：教育部
主办：中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4
教学与研究

教学与研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 87-102.

• 当代中国与世界 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家安全学的学科探索与建构进路

  

  1. 胡尔贵，西南政法大学国家安全学院、总体国家安全观研究院，重庆市国家安全学学术技术带头人；吴兮，西南政法大学总体国家安全观研究院。
  • 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-11-18
  • 作者简介:胡尔贵，西南政法大学国家安全学院教授、总体国家安全观研究院研究员，重庆市国家安全学学术技术带头人；吴兮，西南政法大学总体国家安全观研究院研究人员（重庆 401120）。

  • 基金资助:
    本文系重庆市研究生教育教学改革研究项目“国家安全学博士学位授权点人才培养之实践探索和模式构建”（项目号：YJG233043）、重庆市教育科学规划青年项目“国家安全学人才培养教学案例库的建设与应用研究”（项目号：K23YY20230024）的阶段性成果。

Disciplinary Exploration and Construction Approach of National Security Studies

  1. 1.National Security College,and Institute of Holistic View of National Security,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China;
    2.Institute of Holistic View of National Security,Southewst University of Political Science and Lew,Chongqing 401120,China
  • Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-18

PDF

摘要： 基于对学科建构的既有探寻，剖析国家安全学学科的内在知识逻辑和外在组织形式的变迁融合规律，有利于把握国家安全学学科建设的科学路径。诉诸交叉学科生成理论，回溯国家安全学学科演进历程，国家安全学学科已经经历了问题研究形态、研究领域形态、基本研究范畴形态阶段，如今，已然进入国家安全交叉学科形态阶段，其学科范式、学科定位和学科组织建设已经实现跨越式发展。但是，国家安全学学科建设仍然对关键命题、研究范畴、知识理论渐次递进规律的把握还不充分，认识仍不深刻，学术共同体、学科建设保障较为单薄。为此，要加快推进国家安全学学科建设，就必须在深耕国家安全学学科问题、系统建构学科知识体系的同时，规范外在组织建制，促进国家安全学学科知识更加系统、外在组织更加完善，推动学科建构更加成熟。


关键词: 交叉学科, 国家安全学, 学科建设

Abstract: Based on existing explorations of disciplinary construction, analyzing the evolving integration of the intrinsic knowledge logic and external organizational forms of national security studies will help identify scientific pathways for advancing this discipline. Drawing on interdisciplinary generation theories and reviewing the evolution of national security studies, the discipline has progressed through phases of problemoriented research, domainspecific exploration, and preliminary framework conception. It has now entered a new interdisciplinary stage, achieving leapfrog advancements in its disciplinary paradigm, positioning, and organizational development. However, the construction of national security studies still lacks a sufficient grasp of its key propositions, research scopes, and the progressive logic of theoretical knowledge systems. The academic community remains inadequately consolidated, and institutional support mechanisms for disciplinary development remain relatively underdeveloped. To accelerate the construction of national security studies, it is essential to deepen inquiries into its core issues and systematically build its knowledge system while standardizing its external organizational frameworks. This will ensure a more robust knowledge system and sound institutional mechanisms, ultimately fostering greater maturity in its disciplinary construction. 

Key words:  , interdisciplinary disciplines, national security studies, disciplinary construction