主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

教学与研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 114-123.

• 当代中国与世界 • 上一篇    下一篇

西方式全球治理的逻辑陷阱与中国应对

  

  1. 上海外国语大学国际关系与公共事务学院
  • 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-12
  • 作者简介:孙志伟,上海外国语大学国际关系与公共事务学院副教授(上海 200083)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系2018年度国家社科基金重大项目“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义外交思想研究”(项目号:18ZDA007)、上海市2019年度“阳光计划”(项目号:19YG40)的阶段性成果。

The Logical Trap of Western-style Global Governance and China's Responses

  1. School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China
  • Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-12

摘要: 全球治理是当前国际社会面临的重要任务。历史上看,西方式全球治理以市场手段拓宽治理空间、以淡化主权搭建治理体系、以“普世价值”扩散治理理念等做法无益于全球性问题的解决,更严重侵犯了发展中国家的合法权益。战后欧美大国以西方式的贸易自由化、伪多边主义与“自由民主价值”为理论工具对西方式全球治理进行“话语包装”,进一步加剧了世界范围内的观念冲突,更凸显了西方逻辑的理论缺陷。体制变革离不开理念的引领,全球治理规则向着更加公正合理的方向发展离不开对人类各种优秀文明成果的吸收。全球发展倡议、全球安全倡议、全球文明倡议既为当前治理困境现象的解决提供了中国方案,更体现了马克思主义国际关系理论在破解西方逻辑陷阱时的理论解释力度。

关键词: 全球治理, 资本, 逻辑陷阱, 马克思主义国际关系理论, 中国倡议

Abstract: Global governance is an important task the international community needs to address. From a historical perspective, Westernstyle global governance has broadened the governance space through using market means, built governance systems by diluting sovereignty, and spread governance concepts by using “universal values”, which has not been conducive to solving global problems yet seriously violated the legitimate rights and interests of developing countries. After World War II, the major European and American powers used Westernstyle trade liberalization, pseudomultilateralism and “liberal democratic values” as theoretical tools to “discursively package” Westernstyle global governance, further exacerbating the conflict of ideas around the world and highlighting the limitations of the Western logic. Institutional reform is closely related to the guidance of ideas, and the development of global governance rules towards a more just and reasonable direction is inseparable from the absorption of various outstanding achievements of human civilization. The Global Development Initiative, Global Security Initiative, and Global Civilization Initiative not only provide Chinese solutions to the current governance dilemma, but also reflect the theoretical explanatory power of the Marxist theory of international relations in breaking the Western logical trap.

Key words: global governance, capital, logical trap, Marxist theory of international relations, China's initiatives