主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

教学与研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (10): 5-16.

• 纪念恩格斯诞辰200周年 •    下一篇

作为科学家的恩格斯

  

  1. 南京大学马克思主义学院
  • 出版日期:2020-10-16 发布日期:2020-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 胡大平,南京大学马克思主义学院教授(江苏 南京 210023)。

Engels as a Scientist

  1. School of Marxism, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023,China
  • Online:2020-10-16 Published:2020-10-09

摘要: 第二国际以来,恩格斯一直是有关马克思主义的政治和知识争论的焦点之一。今天,在诸如“马克思和恩格斯的知识关系”等问题成为流行的学术话题时,有一些评价恩格斯的基本原则被遮蔽了。它们涉及马克思主义在思想史上的革命所带来的人物和思想评价的新的标准。缺乏对这些问题的理解,我们就不能谈论作为独立思想家的恩格斯。本文认为,必须从马克思主义视域中的历史科学出发强调恩格斯评价的科学社会主义视域,理解其客观要求以及恩格斯本人对其的认同和历史作用。在这一基础上,以政治经济学批判为例阐明了恩格斯作为独立的思想家在马克思主义形成过程中的地位和作用。最后,以《资本论》续卷的编辑出版为例,阐述了恩格斯对科学精神的理解和实际表现。

关键词: 恩格斯;历史唯物主义;政治经济学批判 

Abstract: Since the Second International, Engels has been one of the focal points of political and intellectual debates about Marxism. Today, when issues such as “the knowledge relationship between Marx and Engels” have become popular academic topics, some basic principles for evaluating Engels have been obscured. They involve the new standards of character and thought evaluation brought about by the revolution of Marxism in the history of thought. Without an understanding of these issues, we cannot talk about Engels as an independent thinker. This article argues that we must start from the historical science of Marxism and emphasize the scientific socialism of Engels' evaluation, and understand its objective requirements, as well as Engels' identification with it and its historical role. On this basis, the critique of political economy is taken as an example to clarify the status and role of Engels as an independent thinker in the formation of Marxism. Finally, taking the editing and publishing of the sequel to Das Kapital as an example, it explained Engels' understanding and actual performance of the scientific spirit.

Key words: Engels, historical materialism, criticism of political economy