主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

《教学与研究》

• 西方思潮评介 • 上一篇    

国际冲突研究的理性范式:争论及启示

董柞壮#br#   

  1. 南开大学周恩来政府管理学院
  • 出版日期:2019-12-16 发布日期:2019-12-05
  • 作者简介:董柞壮,南开大学周恩来政府管理学院讲师(天津 300050)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“国际体系转型与全球治理变革的互动机制研究”(项目号:63192102)的阶段性成果。

Rationalist Paradigm in International Conflict Research:Debates and Enlightenments

Dong Zhuozhuang#br#   

  1. Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300050
  • Online:2019-12-16 Published:2019-12-05

摘要:

理性范式是当前国际冲突研究领域的主流范式之一,在国家间冲突、内战和族群冲突等议题上应用广泛。这一范式聚焦国家间双边互动层次的因素,关注冲突发生前讨价还价过程中的信息问题、承诺问题和议题不可分割性,并以之解释讨价还价的失败与冲突的发生,从而塑造了冲突研究以信息和承诺为双核心的研究导向。理性范式通过研究冲突发生前的博弈过程,超越了争议议题性质的差异,强调国家利益的互动属性,因而在解释冲突问题上具有普遍的意义。理性范式是冲突研究范式演进的结果,具有较强的可扩展性与可操作性,为国际关系其他领域中层理论的创新提供了可行思路。就理论本身的建构而言,理性范式的理论化水平较高,概念指标与逻辑推演明确简约。这能够为中国的国际关系理论创新提供借鉴,即在经验观察、创新概念的同时重视理论的逻辑性与方法性,使理论创新更具普遍现实意义与深刻学理价值。

关键词: 冲突研究 , 理性范式 , 理论创新 , 理论化

Abstract:

Rationalist paradigm is the dominate paradigms in the field of international conflict research. It is widely used in issues such as interstate conflict, civil war
and ethnic conflict. This paradigm focuses on the factors of bilateral interaction between actors, pays attention to the incomplete information, unreliable commitment and issue indivisibility in the bargaining process before the conflict occurs, and explains the failure of bargaining and the occurrence of conflict, thus shaping the research orientation of conflict research with information and commitment as the core. By studying the bargaining process in the shadow of conflict, the rationalist paradigm surpasses the differences in the nature of the disputed issues and emphasizes the interactive nature of national interests, so it has universal significance in interpreting the occurrence of conflict. Rationalist paradigm can be seen as the result of the evolution of conflict research paradigm, which has strong expansibility and operability, and provides feasible ideas for the innovation of middlelevel theory in other fields of IR. As far as the construction of theory itself is concerned, the theorization is relatively high, and the conceptual indicators and logical deduction are clear and concise. Thus it can provide a reference for Chinas theoretical innovation in international relations, that is, empirically observing and innovating concepts while paying attention to the logic and methodology of theory, so that theoretical innovation has more universal practical significance and profound academic value.

Key words: international conflict , rationalist paradigm , theoretical innovation , theorization