主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

《教学与研究》

• 当代中国与世界 • 上一篇    下一篇

进程理性与中国外交

胡宗山1张宏量2#br#   

  1. 1   华中师范大学“一带一路”研究中心;    2  华中师范大学政治与国际关系学院。
     
  • 出版日期:2018-04-16 发布日期:2018-04-16
  • 作者简介:胡宗山,华中师范大学“一带一路”研究中心主任、教授;张宏量,华中师范大学政治与国际关系学院博士研究生(湖北 武汉 430079)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目“未来十年中国外交和战略体系构建研究——战略调整和外交改革”(项目号:14AZD059)的阶段性成果。

Process Rationality and Chinas Diplomacy

Hu Zongshan1, Zhang Hongliang2   

  1. 1The Belt and Road Research Center, Huazhong Normal University,Wuhan,Hubei 430079;
    2School of Politics and International Relations, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079
  • Online:2018-04-16 Published:2018-04-16

摘要: 新中国外交经历了本体自在、主体自为、关系自觉三个不同阶段,展现了立国外交、建国外交到强国外交的三种不同外交形态。不同阶段和不同形态的外交演进的根本原因在于内政外交关系的深层互动,在于“国家人”理性和偏好的相应改变,从而引发国家内外决策和行为的改变。“国家人”理性与偏好的变化根植于新中国内外压诱系统诸要素的历时性演进,呈现出历史主义、进程主义的互动特质。未来的中国外交仍将深刻地受到这一历史逻辑的影响。

关键词: 自在 , 自为 , 自觉 , 进程理性主义 , 中国外交

Abstract: New Chinas diplomacy has experienced three stages: noumenon identification, subject selfreliance and relationship consciousness. It shows three different diplomatic forms: statefounding diplomacy, statebuilding diplomacy to power diplomacy. The fundamental reason for the different stages and different forms of diplomatic evolution lies in the deep interaction between domestic and foreign relations, which lies in the corresponding changes of the rationality and preferences of “national people”, thus triggering the change of decisionmaking and behavior inside and outside the country. The change of rationality and preferences of “national people” is rooted in the diachronic evolution of the elements of internal and external pressure system in New China, showing the characteristics of interaction of historicism and process doctrine. The future of Chinas diplomacy will still be deeply influenced by this historical logic.

Key words: freedom, self , selfconsciousness , process rationalism , Chinese diplomacy