主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

《教学与研究》 ›› 2012, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 57-65.DOI:

• 当代中国与世界 • 上一篇    下一篇

新帝国体系中的制度霸权与治理路径——兼析国际规则“非中性”视角下的美国对华战略

 高程   

  1. 中国社会科学院 亚太与全球战略研究院
  • 出版日期:2012-05-20 发布日期:2012-06-01
  • 作者简介: 高程,中国社会科学院副研究员,主要研究方向为国际政治经济学。

On Institutional Hegemony in the New Empire System and Governance Pathway——American Strategies against China from the“Nonneutral” Perspective of International Rules

 GAO  Cheng   

  1. National Institutes of International Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100007, China
  • Online:2012-05-20 Published:2012-06-01

摘要: 本文运用制度经济学的理论框架,分析了美国通过非中性的国际规则来构建新帝国体系的逻辑和路径。美国霸权的核心驱动力在于,通过对国际机制和规则的主导,来维系新帝国体系的运转和治理,并从中获取霸权收益。美国精英阶层对于中国崛起的最主要关注,并非在于传统霸主国对于崛起国武力挑战的担忧,而是崛起的中国是否会在美国全球统治所依赖的制度领域挑战其权威,甚至成为其竞争者。因此,以现阶段美国的相对实力及其走势,对华长期战略的定位在于有效利用并塑造国际规则及国际机制的非中性性质钳制中国影响力的扩展,最大程度降低中国在美国战略重心地区成为其制度竞争者的可能性。

关键词: 美国 , 新帝国 , 国际规则 , 制度非中性 , 对华战略

Abstract: This paper attempts to analyze the logic and pathway the United States applied to establish a new empire system by referring to nonneutral international rules. The core motive of the American hegemony is maintaining the operation and management of the new empire system in order to gain benefits from hegemony by influencing the international mechanism and rules. The major concern of the American elite about China does not come from worries of a traditional hegemony state in the face of military challenge of an emerging power. Instead, they are worried about whether the rise of China will pose challenge to American authority in the field of institution on which the US relies to maintain its global governance, or, worse still, if China will become its competitor. Therefore, based on the current power of the United States and its development trend, the orientation of its longterm strategies against China is to effectively use and shape international rules and international mechanism to suppress China’s expanding influence with the purpose of downplaying the possibility of China becoming an institutional competitor in critical strategic regions of the United States as much as possible.

Key words: the United States , new empire , international rules , institutionally non-neutral , strategies against China