从北约对乌克兰政策看北约东扩进程

《教学与研究》 ›› 2008, Vol. ›› Issue (2): 58-64.DOI:

从北约对乌克兰政策看北约东扩进程

许海云

中国人民大学历史系, 北京, 100872

收稿日期:2007-12-10 出版日期:2008-02-20 发布日期:2012-03-06

NATO Enlargement from its Policies toward Ukraine

XU Hai-yun

History Department, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2007-12-10 Online:2008-02-20 Published:2012-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 北约经过两轮东扩,势力范围遍及欧亚大陆,但它并不愿就此止步,而是将乌克兰视为新的东扩目标。北约东扩的基础在于冷战后的特殊国际环境、冷战思维,前苏联、波罗的海国家的政治态度以及北约成员利益的协调。北约东扩虽然强化了北约的国际战略地位,但也给国际社会带来了不确定因素,给新成员国内政外交造成冲击。北约要想在国际社会发挥更大作用,一要去除冷战思维,二要改变以扩大数量为标准的发展模式,三要尊重现有的国际行为准则,唯有如此,北约才能得到真正发展。

关键词: 《北约东扩报告》, 橙色革命, 《北约—乌克兰行动计划》, 亲乌远俄政策

Abstract: Although the influence of NATO has covered Eurasia after its two waves of expansion,it doesn’t satisfy with its achievement and look Ukraine as the next target for expansion further.The foundation of NATO Enlargement has been the particular international situation during the Post-Cold War period,the Cold War ideology,the political attitude of the Soviet Union and the Baltic states,and the coordination among those members of NATO.Although NATO Enlargement has strengthened its international strategic position,it also has brought the international society some uncertain factors,which have affected its new member countries heavily.If NATO wants to play an important role in the future,it has to do something important: First,it should get rid of the Cold War ideology,second,it should change its model of development concentrating on its enlarging quantity,and the third is,it should observe existing rules of the international society.This is the only way that NATO can prolong its life and develop a lot.

Key words: "Study on NATO Enlargement", Orange revolution, NATO-Ukraine Action Plan, Keep touch with Ukraine and keep a distance with Russia

中图分类号:

D815

许海云. 从北约对乌克兰政策看北约东扩进程[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2008, (2): 58-64.

XU Hai-yun. NATO Enlargement from its Policies toward Ukraine[J]. Teaching and Research, 2008, (2): 58-64.

参考文献

[1] Robert Osgood.Alliances and American Foreign Policy[M].Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1968.
[2] Maria Kopylenko.Ukraine:Between NATO and Russia[A].Gale A.Mattox,Arthur R.Rachwald (eds.).Enlarging NATO,The National Debates[C].Boulder,London:Lynne Rienner Publishers,2001.
[3] Stephen Pelz.The Case for Limiting NATO Enlargement[J].National Security Studies,Quarterly 3,No.3,Summer 1997.
[4] Geoffrey Lee Williams,Barkly Jared Jones.NATO and the Transatlantic Alliance in the 21st Century,The Twenty-Year Crisis[M].New York:Palgrave,2001.
[5] David S.Yost.NATO's Transformed,The Alliance's New Roles in International Security[M].Washington,D.C.:United States Institute of Peace Press,1998.
[6] Clay Clemens.NATO and the Quest for post-Cold War Security[M].New York:St.Martin's Press,1997.
[7] Interview with John Colston[Z].NATO HQ,Brussels,http://www,into.int/docu/speech/ 2006/s 060111a.htm
[8] Prague Summit Declaration,NATO's Nations and Partners for Peace[Z].2003,(1).
[9] Opening Statement of Secretary General[Z].Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council,Berlin,http://www,nato.int/docu/ pr/1996/p96-16Se,htm.
[10] Yaroslav Bilinsky.Endgame in NATO's Enlargetrent,The Baltic States and Ukraine,Westport[M].Connecticut and London:Praeger,1999.
[11] Sean Kay.NATO Enlargement:Who Gains? Who Loses?[A].in Gustav Schmidt (ed.).A History of NATO-The First Fifty Years[C].Volume 1.New York:Palgrave,2001.
[12] Alexander J.MotyL Ukraine,Europe,and Russiat Exclusion or Dependence[A].in Anatol Lieven,Dmitri Trenin (eds.).Ambivalent Neighbors,The EU,NATO,and the Price of Membership[C].Washington,D.C.:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,2003.
[13] Richard K.Betts.Systems of Peace as Causes of War? Collective Security,Arms Control,and the New Europe[A].in Jack Synder,Robert Jarvis(eds.).Coping with Complexity in the International System[C].Boulder,San Francisco,Oxford:Westview Press,1993.
[14] Margarita M.Balmaceda.On the Edge,Ukrainian-Central European-Russian Security Triangle[M].Budapest.Central European University Press,2000.

[1]	唐虹. 非政府环保组织与联合国气候谈判[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (9): 66-72.
[2]	肖晞. 东北亚安全走向与中国战略调整[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (7): 75-80.
[3]	王海滨, 戴长征. 国际难民现状与难民机制建设[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (6): 78-85.
[4]	汤伟. 气候变化、国际体系转型与中美关系[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, 59(4): 72-79.
[5]	曹兴. 国际公共权力利益探源[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (3): 62-67.
[6]	吴征宇. 地理政治变迁与21世纪前期的美国大战略[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (2): 61-68.
[7]	黄忠, 唐小松. 试论亚太地区对中国崛起的认知与反应[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (2): 69-76.
[8]	李志斐. 环境安全化路径分析与治理体系构建[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2011, (1): 63-70.
[9]	李景治. 全球治理的困境与走向[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (12): 32-40.
[10]	卢静. 透析全球环境治理的困境[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (8): 73-80.
[11]	许勤华. 低碳经济对大国关系的影响[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (7): 33-38.
[12]	钟飞腾, 门洪华. 中国国际政治经济学学科的发展历程[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (6): 85-93.
[13]	黄昭宇. 非传统安全问题的本质及解决路径[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (4): 60-66.
[14]	代恒猛. 全球化与欧洲“福利国家”:一个理论研究视角[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (4): 67-72.
[15]	杨光海. 国际制度与国家软实力的增进[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2010, (3): 62-68.