制度分析的层次问题与国际制度研究

《教学与研究》 ›› 2007, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 82-87.DOI:

制度分析的层次问题与国际制度研究

田野

中国人民大学国际关系学院, 北京100872

收稿日期:2007-01-10 出版日期:2007-05-20 发布日期:2012-03-05
基金资助:
教育部社科研究青年基金项目“中国参与国际合作的制度形式研究”(项目编号:05JCGJW012)的阶段性成果

The Level of Institutional Analysis and the Study of International Institutions

TIAN Ye

School of International Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2007-01-10 Online:2007-05-20 Published:2012-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经济学和政治学中的新制度主义理论大都将某一层次的制度作为自己的分析对象,而把更高层次的制度作为给定的外生变量。从关于国际制度层次划分的代表性观点来看,构成性制度相对于限制性制度而言是更高层次的制度,普遍性制度相对于特殊性制度而言是更高层次的制度。这种将国际制度区分为不同层次的视角,有助于我们认识国际制度研究中新自由制度主义与建构主义之间的理论争鸣。

关键词: 制度分析, 层次问题, 国际制度研究

Abstract: The theories of new institutionalism in economics and political science usually focus on a particular institutional level and take a higher institutional level as given.From the commonly accepted view about levels of international institutions,constitutive institutions are higher than regulative institutions,and general institutions are higher than specific institutions.This perspective of classifying different institutional levels sheds light on our understanding of the contestation between neoliberal institutionalism and constructivism in the study of international institutions.

Key words: institutional analysis, the level, the study of international institutions

中图分类号:

D820

田野. 制度分析的层次问题与国际制度研究[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2007, (5): 82-87.

TIAN Ye. The Level of Institutional Analysis and the Study of International Institutions[J]. Teaching and Research, 2007, (5): 82-87.

参考文献

[1] B.Guy Peters.Institutional Theory in Political Science[M].London and New York:Wellington House,1999.
[2] L.E.戴维斯,D.C.诺思.制度变迁的理论:概念与原因[A].R.科斯、A.阿尔钦,D.诺思等.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集[C].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994.
[3] Oliver Williamson.Hierarchies,Markets and Power in the economy:An Economic Perspective[ A ].in Claude Menard (ed.).Transaction Cost Economics:Recent Developments[ C].Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,1997.
[4] 奥利佛·威廉姆森.治理机制[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001.
[5] 约拉姆·巴泽尔.国家理论——经济权利、法律权利与国家范围[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2006.
[6] 思拉恩·埃格特森.经济行为与制度[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[7] 埃里克·弗鲁博顿,鲁道夫·芮切特.新制度经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2006.
[8] G.John Ikenberry.Conclusion:An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Policy[J].International Organization,Vol.42,No.1,Winter 1988.
[9] Peter Hall,Rosemary Taylor.Political Science and Three Institutionalism[J].Political Studies,Vol.XLIV,No.5,Deceber 1996.
[10] 何俊志.结构、历史与行为——历史制度主义对政治科学的重构[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.
[11] 丹尼尔·迪厄梅尔等.作为方法论的制度主义[A].薛晓源,陈家刚.全球化与新制度主义[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[12] Robert Keohane.International Institutions and State Power:Essays in International Relations Theory[M].Boulder:Westview Press,1989.
[13] John Ruggie.Multilateralism Matters[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1993.
[14] Donald Puchala,Raymond Hopkins.International Regimes:Lessons from Inductive Analysis[A].in Stephen Krasner (ed.).International Regimes[C].Ithaca and London:Cornell University Press,1983.
[15] Christian Reus-Smit.The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions[J].International Organization,Vol.51,No.4,Autumn 1997.
[16] 约翰·鲁杰.什么因素把世界维系在一起[A].彼得·卡赞斯坦,罗伯特·基欧汉,斯蒂芬·克拉斯纳.世界政治中的探索与争鸣[C].上海:上海世纪出版集团,2006.
[17] Kalevi J.Holsti.Taming the Sovereigns:Institutional Change in International Politics[M].Cambridge and New York:Cambridge University Press,2004.
[18] Oliver Williamson.The New Institutional Economics:Taking Stock,Looking Ahead[J].Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.38,No.3,2000.
[19] Alastair Iain Johnston.Treating International Institutions as Social Environments[J].International Studies,Quarterly 45,2001.
[20] 莉莎·马丁,贝思·西蒙斯.国际制度的理论与经验研究[A].彼得·卡赞斯坦,罗伯特·基欧汉,斯蒂芬·克拉斯纳.世界政治中的探索与争鸣[C].上海:上海世纪出版集团,2006.
[21] Jennifer Sterling-Folker.Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared[ J ].International Studies,Quarterly 44,2000.