福特主义、新福特主义和后福特主义——兼论当代发达资本主义国家生产方式的演变

《教学与研究》 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (8): 36-42.DOI:

福特主义、新福特主义和后福特主义——兼论当代发达资本主义国家生产方式的演变

谢富胜¹, 黄蕾²

1. 中国人民大学经济学院, 北京100872;
2. 陕西师范大学政治经济学院, 陕西西安710062

收稿日期:2005-06-10 出版日期:2005-08-20 发布日期:2012-03-05

Fordism, Neo-Fordism and Post-Fordism——On Evolution of Production Mode in Developed Capitalist Countries

XIE Fu-sheng¹, HUANG Lei²

1. School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
2. School of Political Economy, Shanxi Normal University, Xi’an, Shanxi 710062, China

Received:2005-06-10 Online:2005-08-20 Published:2012-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 20世纪60年代末期福特主义的危机,使西方发达资本主义国家进行了长达20余年的经济结构调整。在此过程中,逐渐形成了应对福特主义危机的两种模式:新福特主义和后福特主义。从20世纪90年代发达资本主义国家的发展来看,后福特主义代表着当代发达资本主义国家生产方式演变的方向,其中精益生产模式逐渐成为占主导地位的生产方式。

关键词: 福特主义, 新福特主义, 后福特主义

Abstract: The crisis of Fordism in the late 1960s led to an economic restructuring in the developed capitalist countries in the west, which had lasted for over 20 years. During this process, two schools emerged against the crisis of Fordism: neo-Fordism and post-Fordism. Evidence since the 1990s showed that it is the post-Fordism that represents the direction of evolution in production mode in modern developed capitalist countries, with lean production gradually gaining ground and becoming dominent.

Key words: Fordism, Neo-Fordism, Post-Fordism

中图分类号:

谢富胜, 黄蕾. 福特主义、新福特主义和后福特主义——兼论当代发达资本主义国家生产方式的演变[J]. 《教学与研究》, 2005, (8): 36-42.

XIE Fu-sheng, HUANG Lei. Fordism, Neo-Fordism and Post-Fordism——On Evolution of Production Mode in Developed Capitalist Countries[J]. Teaching and Research, 2005, (8): 36-42.

参考文献

[1] Smith, T. Technology and Capital in the Age of Lean Production [M]. New York: State University of New York Press,2000.
[2] Amin,A. (ed). Post-Fordism: A reader [M].Cambridge : Blackwell, 1994.
[3] Jessop,Bob. Regulationist Perspective on Fordism and Post-Fordism [M]. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2001.
[4] 安东尼奥·葛兰西.狱中札记[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[5] 哈里·布雷弗曼.劳动与垄断资本[M].北
[6] 谢富胜.分工、技术与生产组织变迁[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.
[7] Aglietta, M. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: the US Experience [M]. London:Verso,1979.
[8] 罗伯特·阿尔布里坦等.资本主义的发展阶段——繁荣、危机和全球化[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
[9] Lipietz,A. Mirages and Miracles-The Crises of Global Foridism [M]. London: Verso, 1987.
[10] Piore, M. J. & Sabel, C. The Second Industrial Divide [M]. New York: Basic Books,1984.
[11] 徐国庆.新福特主义与后福特主义职业教育发展模式比较研究[J].教育发展研究,2004,(12).
[12] Williams, K., Cutler, T., Williams, J. and Haslam, C. The End of Mass Production?[J]. Economy and Society, 1987,16,(3).
[13] Bonefeld, W. & Holloway, J. Post-Fordism and Social Form [M]. Cambridge: Blackwell,1991.
[14] Boyer, Robert & Saillard, Yves. Regulation Theory [M]. London & New York: Routledge,2002.
[15] Storper, M. & Scott, A. J. Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development[M]. London & New York: Routledge, 1992.
[16] Harvey, D. The Condition of Postmodernity:An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change [M]. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989.
[17] 马克思.资本论(法文版)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1984.
[18] Wood, S. (ed). The Transformation of Work?[M]. London:Unwin Hyman, 1989.
[19] Florida, R. & Kenney, M. The Breakthrough Illusion [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1990.
[20] Harrison,Bennett. Lean and Mean [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1994.
[21] 罗伯特·W·考克斯.生产、权力和世界秩序——社会力量在缔造历史中的作用[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2004.
[22] 丹尼斯·贝尔.后工业社会的来临[M].北京:新华出版社,1997.
[23] Hirst, P. and Zeitlin, J. Flexible Specialization Versus Post-Fordism: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications [J]. Economy & Society, 1989,20,(1).
[24] Kenney,M. & Florida,R. Beyond Mass Production:The Japanese System and Its Transfer to the US [M]. London: Oxford University Press,1993.
[25] 沃麦克等.改变世界的机器[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.