主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

教学与研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 127-142.

• 当代中国与世界 • 上一篇    下一篇

美国对华关系安全化的理论诠释与现实应对

  

  1. 同济大学政治与国际关系学院
  • 出版日期:2025-05-16 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 作者简介:丁迪,同济大学政治与国际关系学院副教授(上海 200092)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“全球新兴技术安全治理与中国路径选择研究”(项目号:2024JG008BGJ1154)的阶段性成果。

Theoretical Interpretation of and Practical Response to the Securitization of China-US Relations

  1. School of Political Science and International Relations, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Online:2025-05-16 Published:2025-05-20

摘要: 大国关系安全化是指一国将其与他国的经济、科技、人文等诸多领域的关系均视为安全威胁,并以安全博弈为首要原则来处理双边关系。大国关系安全化受其所处战略环境、行为动机与主体互动三个主要因素影响。这三个因素的特征及相互作用决定了大国关系安全化的走向。随着中美国家实力对比此消彼长,美国将中国视为主要竞争对手,在战略环境判断、行为动机设定与互动模式选择上都采取了零和博弈与激化矛盾的策略,导致美国对华关系安全化面临泛化与失控风险。对此,中国需要在改变安全共识、加强对话沟通与构建新战略稳定机制三个方面,扭转美国对华关系安全化的扩张趋势,防止中美关系落入泛安全化陷阱。


关键词: 中美竞争, 安全化, 安全互动, 安全风险, 战略分析

Abstract: The securitization of major-power relations refers to a country framing its economic, technological, cultural, and other interactions with other countries as security threats, and prioritizing security competition as the primary principle in handling bilateral relations. The securitization of major-power relations is shaped by three key factors: the strategic environment they face, their behavioral motivations, and interactions between the actors. The characteristics and interplay of these factors determine the trajectory of such securitization. Amid shifting power dynamics between China and the United States (US), with the US increasingly perceiving China as its primary strategic competitor, the US has adopted strategies of zerosum competition and exacerbated conflict in assessing the strategic environment, setting behavioral motivations, and choosing interaction patterns. This approach has led to risks of overextension and loss of control in the USs securitization of relations with China. In response, China must work to reverse the expansion of USdriven securitization of its relations with China in three aspects: reshaping security perceptions, enhancing dialogue mechanisms, and constructing a new strategic stability framework, thereby preventing bilateral relations from falling into a pansecuritization trap.


Key words: China-US competition, securitization, security interaction, security risk, strategic analysis