|
|
A Discussion of the Theory on Five Types of Social Formations——A Critical Review of the Paper Questioning the Major Evidence of "Five Types of Social Formations"
XI Zhao-yong
Teaching and Research
2006, (2):
26-32.
This paper holds a different idea from the one expressed in Questioning the Major Evidence of /Five Types of Social,Formations by Professor Duan Zhongqiao.The author points out that Duan’s paper regarded Grundrisse as the basis of /The Preface.This showed that Duan actually failed to make a distinction between Grundrisse and the officially published A Contribution to the Critique Political Economy(Book Ⅰ).Moreover,Duan’s interpretation of some arguments in Grundrisse is also questionable.Therefore,Duan’s refutation of /five types of social formations is not well justified.
Reference |
Related Articles |
Metrics |
Comments（0）
|
|
