主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Search Result

    Search within results Open Search
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Four Models of Philosophic Dialogue between China and the West
    WANG Nan shi
    Teaching and Research    2004, (6): 11-16.  
    Abstract1175)      PDF(pc) (809KB)(1699)       Save
    This article identifies four models of philosophic dialogue between China and the West in the light of degrees of recognition of characteristics of each side, and self-confidence in adaptability of Chinese philosophy to modern life. The four models are as follows: (1), without clearly established recognition but with self confidence; (2), without either clearly established recognition nor self confidence; (3), with both clearly established recognition and self confidence; and (4), with clearly established recognition but without self confidence. The author maintains that while the second model had long been dominant in history, the increasing use of the third model in recent years is of great significance. It may lead to reconstruction of the traditional Chinese philosophy in some way, and may develop in positive correlation with the fourth model, which will enables contemporary Chinese philosophy to fit into the contemporary social life. The author predicts that the interactive relation between the third and the fourth models is likely to exist for a long period of time.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
    Three Forms of Dialectics
    Wang Nanshi
    Teaching and Research    1998, (5): 18-22.  
    Abstract1205)      PDF(pc) (709KB)(1627)       Save
    Three forms of dialectics are inspected from the point of view of relation between dialectics and basic ideas of philosophy.Visual dialectics attempts to interpret the world by general principles,though its reasoning has never reached the level of pure conceptions.Introspective philosophy reveals contradication within the concepts themselves and thus resulting in reasoning deeper down to the level of the essence.However,the nature of this profoundness is of negativeness.Historic dialectics admits necessity of existence of contradictions,and looks upon contradiction as a logical developing process in history.Hegel was a great success in historic dialectics,but the subjectivity of his dialectics was absolute Abstract spirit.So his historic dialectics is not without defect.It is this defect that has led to Marx’s theory of practice and historic dialectics.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
  Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords