主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Search Result

    Search within results Open Search
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Creator and Guardian,or Liberator and Saver——Existential Explanation and Supplementation of Historical Materialism
    LUO Qian
    Teaching and Research    2010, (6): 14-20.  
    Abstract1197)      PDF(pc) (1000KB)(1686)       Save
    By inheriting the enlightenment principles of creation and promotion in criticizing modern alienation,historical materialism interprets the future history as being composed of freedom and liberation.However,guarding existence has been highlighted to be the basic ontological task against the precarious abyss of the capital.Thus,salvation and liberation constitute the dual themes of historical materialism in the contemporary period.The author remarks that the theme of salvation is closely related to the intrinsic nature and consolidation of historical materialism in the contemporary time.
    Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
    Basic Characters of Maxist Critical Theory——From the Perspective of Comparing Theories of Modernity and Post Modernity
    LUO Qian
    Teaching and Research    2009, (5): 44-51.  
    Abstract1208)      PDF(pc) (1658KB)(1765)       Save
    The paper maintains that Marxist critical theory should not be categorized simply into modernism or post-modernism.The paper explains the general character of the methodology of Marxist critical theory,its value perspective in light of social classes,practicality of the theoretical critique,and the dialectical nature of the critical attitude of Marxist critical theory through comparison of modernism and post-modernism.The paper is meant to emphasize the unique characters of Marxist critical thoery and its theoretical and practical significance in the modern context.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
    Two Orientations to Criticism of“Modernity”—— On basic Differences between Marx’ Criticism of Capital and Discourse of Modem Philosophy
    LUO Qian
    Teaching and Research    2005, (7): 16-22.  
    Abstract1257)      PDF(pc) (1484KB)(1770)       Save
    This paper maintains that criticism of modernity in discourse of modern philosophy today focuses mainly on the ideological side, which tends to consider the spirit and principles of enlightenment as the most internal aspects to account for the dilemma of modernity. When Marx criticized the capitalist modern ideology, the author reasons, he referred to the category of capital to conceptualize modernity, and interpreted the essential principles and construct of the modern existence theory in the light of historical materialism. However, discourse of modern philosophy failed to understand the meaning of Marxist category of capital, and then unconsciously, if not consciously, refers to it as an economic theory of reversion. While doing so, they consider Marxist theory a theory of modernity to adhere to or criticize. Consequently, the founding significance of Marx’ criticism of modernity gets lost. This article analyzes the basic differences between Marx’s criticism of modernity by referring to capital and the modern discourse that is so popular nowadays, and emphasizes the critical position of Marxist ideas in modern criticism.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments0
  Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords