Abstract: In the “German Ideology”, Marx criticized concisely and profoundly Stirners exposition in his “ego and its own” on Chinese nationalities such as China entity, Chinese Spirit and China action Stirner concluded the Chinese history as follows: crawling around ancient traditional entity like ants, Chinese selfimagined heaven with no conflict, no matter how the outside world changes, Chinese will not therefore change their actions Chinese action is standing still Marx criticized the metaphysical trap set by Stirner on Chinese history from the concept world to the things world, and explained how Chinese react according to the factsThe success or failure of “China road” depends on whether it comply with the “things world ruling the concept world” 

Key words: China road , the concept of world , things world , Chinese nationality

摘要： 马克思在《德意志意识形态》中，针对施蒂纳在《唯一者及其所有物》中关于中国人、中国实体、中国精神和中国行动等中国民族性问题的阐述，进行了简明而深刻的批判。施蒂纳把全部中国历史理解为：围绕古老传统实体蚂蚁般的爬行，中国人自我想象了一个没有冲突的天国，无论外部如何改变，中国人都不会因此改变自己的行动。马克思批判了施蒂纳设定中国历史从概念世界到事物世界的形而上学圈套，并用事实说明了中国人如何因势而动。未来“中国道路”的成败决定于是否遵从“事物世界统治概念世界”之路。

关键词: 中国道路 , 概念世界 , 事物世界 , 中国民族性