In 2018, the added value of Chinas three industries accounted for 72%, 407%, and 522% of GDP respectively. Is this industrial structure consistent with China's current development stage, and is it conducive to highquality development? Previous studies have focused on the allocation of factors between industries, but have not paid attention to the industrial structure standards at different stages of economic development. To this end, this paper summarizes the historical experiences of the industrial structure evolution of different countries at different stages of economic development, such as described by Kuznets and Channer, and the positive and negative laws of the industrial structure evolution of the typical countries that span the  middle income trap, as well as the stage standard for the evolution of industrial structure in developing countries. That is to say, the industrial proportion at the end of industrialization and the service industry account for about 40% and 50% respectively. China's industrial structure evolution is basically in line with the law of industrial evolution, but the current proportion of industrial and service industries has basically reached the level of completion of industrialization in other countries. Therefore, China's future industrial restructuring is no longer the main pursuit of the expansion of the tertiary industry, but to accelerate the development of the real economy and promote the overall quality of the tertiary industry.