主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

《教学与研究》

• 马克思主义基本理论 • 上一篇    下一篇

再论马克思“人类学笔记”的“研究性质”

林锋   

  1. 北京大学马克思主义学院
  • 出版日期:2019-03-16 发布日期:2019-03-11
  • 作者简介:林锋,北京大学马克思主义学院教授、北京大学中国特色社会主义理论大众化与国际传播协同创新中心研究员(北京 100871)。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目“晚年马克思五个重要笔记新探讨”(项目号:11CZX013)的阶段性成果。

On the “Nature of Research” of Marxs “Anthropological Notes”

Lin Feng   

  1. School of Marxism, Peking University, Beijing 100871
  • Online:2019-03-16 Published:2019-03-11

摘要: 澄清马克思“人类学笔记”与“人类学”的真实关系,正确界定笔记的“研究性质”,对于深刻认识笔记的思想主题及晚年马克思的学术志趣、学术贡献,有着重大的意义。晚年马克思在其“人类学笔记”中所从事的学术研究,不应定性为实证科学、经验科学性质的“人类学研究”,而应界定为一种唯物史观色彩的“历史哲学研究”。笔记是为了配合晚年马克思一个重要的唯物史观“创新计划”而作的。晚年马克思并不是像摩尔根等人类学家那样去从事什么实证科学色彩的“人类学研究”,而是试图利用当时世界人类学的最新科学成果,创造性地发展唯物史观,系统地探索唯物史观的原始社会、文明起源理论。澄清这一点,有助于还原马克思主义思想史的真相,深刻理解“人类学笔记”的主题、主旨及晚年马克思学术探索的实质,驳斥西方学界有关“两个马克思”对立的观点。

关键词: 人类学笔记 , 研究性质 , 人类学 , 唯物史观

Abstract: Clarifying the true relationship between Marxs “Anthropological Notes” and “Anthropology” and correctly defining the“nature of research”of those notes is of great significance for a deep understanding of Marxs academic interest and academic contribution in his later years. In his later years, Marxs academic research in his “Anthropological Notes” should not be characterized as “anthropological research” of empirical science and empirical science, but should be defined as a “historical philosophy study” of historical materialism. The Notes were made in line with Marxs important historical materialism “innovation plan” in his later years. In his later years, Marx tried to use the latest scientific achievements of the worlds anthropology at that time to creatively develop historical materialism and systematically explore and formulate the theories about the primitive society and the origin of civilization. Clarifying this point will help to restore the truth of the history of Marxist thought and refute the views of the Western academic circles on the“two Marx”opposition.

Key words: Anthropological Notes , nature of research , anthropology , historical materialism