《教学与研究》
• 哲学研究 • 上一篇 下一篇
王海滨
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Wang Hai-bin
Online:
Published:
摘要:
对哲学与现实关系问题的解读方式差异,形成了两种不同的哲学研究范式:现实哲学化与哲学现实化。前者倾向于对现实进行概括、抽象和提升,把问题提升到哲学理念层面运思,并注重建构解释世界的哲学体系,黑格尔是其集大成者。在批判这种现实哲学化研究理路的基础上,马克思倾向于以哲学方式关注实践动向与历史发展,注重哲学改变世界的功能,全面开启了哲学现实化的研究范式转型。如果说黑格尔集成了用思辨逻辑形式解释世界的现实哲学化研究范式,那么马克思开辟的哲学现实化道路则是后黑格尔哲学的典范。
关键词: 黑格尔 , 马克思 , 现实哲学化 , 哲学现实化
Abstract:
The different answers to the relationship between philosophy and reality formed two different philosophical paradigms in the history of philosophy: reality of philosophy and philosophy of reality. The former paradigm focused on the practical problems of philosophy to abstract and to enhance and Constructed to explain the philosophical system of the world, and Hegel is the synthesizer. Marx criticized the theory of purely forwarding of real life to philosophy, focused on the development of philosophy along with the time trend. Opened up the functions of philosophy to change the world, and completed the reality of the philosophical paradigm of philosophy. If Hegel had completed the logical form of speculative, philosophical paradigm to explain the world, the philosophy of Marx opened up the road of reality, which is a model of postHegelian philosophy.
Key words: Hegel , Marx , reality of philosophy , philosophy of reality
王海滨. 现实哲学化与哲学现实化——从黑格尔到马克思的哲学范式转型[J]. 《教学与研究》, DOI: .
Wang Hai-bin. From Hegel to Marx’s Philosophical Paradigm Transformation——Reality of Philosophy and Philosophy of Reality[J]. Teaching and Research, DOI: .
0 / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: http://jxyyj.ruc.edu.cn/CN/
http://jxyyj.ruc.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V50/I6/22