主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 0257-2826  CN 11-1454/G4

Most Read articles

    Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All

    In last 3 years
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    The Transcendence of Modernity: Historical Implications of Marx's Discussions of the “Jewish Question”
    Lin Zhao
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (10): 56-64.  
    Abstract3226)      PDF (1214KB)(517)       Save
    The core of the “Jewish question” is about how the Jews were emancipated within the modernity framework: emancipated as human beings or as Jews. Bruno Bauer proposed a solution of assimilation, requiring the abandonment of religious particularity by the Jews and Christians and assimilation of them into “human beings”. Distinct from this Enlightenment approach, Marx raised a different question through discussions of political emancipation. He argued that the Jews could not be emancipated within the modernity framework; they could only be genuinely emancipated by transcending modernity. After the debates between political Zionism and cultural Zionism, the Jews finally reestablished Israel. Nevertheless, the rebuilding of this Jewish state is not the realization of emancipation, for the Jews are still trapped in the modernity dilemma of the “war of all against all”. Marx's discussions of the “Jewish question” have historical implications, i.e. for a nation with a long history, a profound culture, and numerous sufferings to be emancipated and revitalized, modernity must be simultaneously obtained and transcended. For the Chinese who are committed to the national rejuvenation, it is necessary to bear in mind lessons from the Jews and teachings of Marx, and pursue the unification of the Chinese emancipation and human emancipation based on the transcendence of the modern capitalist civilization.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Nature and Contemporary Significance of Cultural Confidence
    Zhang Chuankai, Shan Chuanyou
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (9): 41-47.  
    Abstract2830)      PDF (5632KB)(493)       Save
    Cultural confidence is the confidence in the socialist culture with Chinese characteristics, not merely the confidence in the traditional Chinese culture. It is not the same with confidence in theory, which is essentially the confidence in an ideology. The essence of cultural confidence is the confidence in values. Cultural confidence is the most fundamental form of confidence as manifested as follows. Cultural values are found in the choosing of the socialist path, theory, and system with Chinese characteristics. The socialist path, theory, and system with Chinese characteristics are rooted in the profound history and culture of China. And the confidence in culture and values is more essential, fundamental and lasting. Cultural confidence does not imply cultural determinism, cultural revivalism, or cultural hegemonism.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Centuryold Party from the Perspective of Global Political Parties
    Chen Qi
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (4): 110-118.  
    Abstract2161)      PDF (6216KB)(353)       Save
    Political parties with centurylong history that are still active in the political arena of various countries are unique among parties in the global political landscapeAn overall investigation and analysis of them can provide implications for the centuryold Communist Party of China in terms of the Party building and governanceBased on the theoretical analyses, methodological approaches and empirical evidence accumulated by the academia over the years, this paper explores the basic features of the centuryold political parties around the world, summarizes their historical experience and development, and identifies the current challenges they face, through which valuable insights are drawn

    Related Articles | Metrics
    esearch on the Achievements, Problems and Paths of Building a Modern Industrial System in the New Era
    Wang Guijun, Zhang Hui
    Teaching and Research    2023, 57 (6): 12-30.  
    Abstract1900)      PDF (13267KB)(307)       Save
    The modern industrial system is contained in Chinesestyle modernization. It is the material and technical foundation for China to build a socialist modern country and consists of two major components:the power system and support system. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, although China has made remarkable achievements in many fields of building a modern industrial system, there are still obstacles and challenges in individual fields such as industrial structure evolution, digital economy development, and technological innovation. Deepening the construction of a modern industrial system should take the digital economy as the core engine, while vigorously promote the development of strategic emerging industries and the transformation and upgrading of traditional real economy, ensure the synchronous followup and deep integration of modern service industry, modern circulation industry, and modern infrastructure system: The firstly is to fully unleash dividends of digital economy development, promote technological change through the digital economy and create an internal driving force system centered around the digital economy. The Secondly is to stabilize the scale of the real economy from both the internal driving mechanism of the industrial system and the external guarantee mechanism, and create a mechanism for the development of the real economy that promotes quality through quantity and ensures quantity through quality. The thirdly is to accelerate the development of modern service industry, modern circulation industry, and modern infrastructure, and promote the deep integration of the support system and the power system.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Antihegemonism: The Historical Experiences of Contemporary China
    Wang Xutian, Qin Hanyuan
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (1): 54-69.  
    Abstract1618)      PDF (3499KB)(313)       Save
    Hegemonism refers to ideas,opinions,policies and behaviors of a country which takes advantage of its economic,political,military,cultural,and scientific and technological power to suppress and control other countries and pursue a dominant role in international affairs around the world or in a region Antihegemonism means ideas,opinions,policies and behaviors that resist,deny and fight against hegenomism The antihegemonism of contemporary China has undergone a historical evolution in the past 70plus years consisting of five stages It is manifested in political,military,cultural,economic and scientific and technological dimensions and the related approaches It is a continuation of anticolonialism,and essentially an opposition against the unequal international relations and order since the modern times It is a fundamental strategy and basic value in the foreign relations of contemporary China China's antihegemonic efforts have accumulated valuable historical experiences,and revealed a historical law of human development: a hegemony will inevitably decline,and antihegemonism will finally win

    Related Articles | Metrics
    How the CPC Promotes the Sinicization, Contemporization, and Popularization of Marxism: A Centenary History and Historical Experiences
    Han Qingxiang, Chen Yuanzhang
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (5): 5-15.  
    Abstract1588)      PDF (8049KB)(351)       Save
    The sinicization, contemporization and popularization of Marxism promoted by the Communist Party of China (CPC) have undergone a historical evolution. This is a centurylong history starting from the introduction of Marxism into China. As part of the philosophical review of the centenary development of the CPC, it is necessary to look back upon the evolution and summarize experiences of the sinicization, contemporization and popularization of Marxism, and thereupon get some inspirations. We hold that the sinicization, contemporization and popularization of Marxism in different periods, despite their different focuses in both form and content, should not be analyzed separately, but rather be reviewed in an elaborate and holistic way. To put it shortly, the sinicization, contemporization and popularization of Marxism have undergone seven periods of development: introduction and dissemination (1917-1935), cultivation and harvest (1935-1949); twists and turns (1949-1966); confusion and striving (1966-1977); reflection and rebirth (1978-1982); breakthroughs and innovation (1982-2011); and innovation and new advancement (2012 until now). During the centurylong process of the sinicization, contemporization and popularization of Marxism, the CPC and the Marxist precursors of China have accumulated very valuable historical experiences. Specifically, they find that it is necessary to ensure the dialectical unity of “a sole guidance and a pluralist dialogue”, the solidarity between leaders and agents of practice, the consistency between national conditions and trends of the times, and the interaction and integration between China's cultural foundation and world civilizations.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    A Study on the Origin and Evolution of Discourse of“Chinese Path to Modernization”
    Hu Guosheng
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (12): 109-117.  
    Abstract1578)      PDF (6732KB)(269)       Save
    Chinese Path to Modernization, led by the Communist Party of China(CPC), based on China's reality,is a socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics,which is different from Western modernization and has expanded the way for developing countries to achieve modernization.“Chinese Path to Modernization” is a historical concept ,originated from Marxist modernization theory, first explored in the revolutionary situation of the CPC, conceived in the construction practice of the Four Modernizations during the socialist revolution and construction period , generated in the construction practice of the reform and opening-up and socialist modernization, and shaped in the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics.The evolution of the concept of “Chinese Path to Modernization” reveals the historical track of the CPC's goal of building a great modern socialist country in an all-round way, and clearly presents the path chosen by the CPC to create a new model for human advancement at the level of theoretical innovation and practical breakthroughs.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    The New Development Philosophy and Chinese-style Modernization
    Wang Binglin
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (10): 10-14.  
    Abstract1478)      PDF (3311KB)(323)       Save
    The new development philosophy of innovative, coordinated, green, open and shared development is an organic and unified whole. It is not only a strategic guideline for dealing with challenges and obstacles facing Chinas development at present, but also a development theory with longterm guiding significance. It is also a guiding principle and theoretical basis for promoting Chinesestyle modernization. The new development philosophy of innovative, coordinated, green, open and shared development that we adhere to will provide a strong driving force, as well as ideological and scientific guidance for promoting Chinesestyle modernization.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    Ten Years of Great Changes in the New Era
    Shen Chuanliang
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (11): 15-24.  
    Abstract1464)      PDF (8239KB)(386)       Save
    Over the past ten years in the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics, we have experienced three major events of great and profound significance, secured historic achievements and seen historic changes. The great achievements of the new era have come from the collective dedication and hard work of the Party and the people, with the most fundamental reasons being the leadership of the CPC Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core and the scientific guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. Through great changes over the past ten years in the new era, we have accumulated valuable experience, which is a milestone in the history of the Party, the history of new China, the history of reform and openingup, the history of socialist development, and the history of the development of the Chinese nation.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Marx and Engels' Concept of “the Proletariat” and its Modern Development
    Lin Feng, Wang Xianpeng
    Teaching and Research    2023, 57 (1): 35-44.  
    Abstract1385)      PDF (7272KB)(327)       Save
    With the changes in the working modes and living conditions of the working class in developed capitalist countries, the argument of the “disappearance of the proletariat” has emerged and produced considerable influence in the academic circle. In order to respond to this argument, we must go back to the classic writings of Marxism, examine and restore the original meaning of the concept of “the proletariat” developed by Marx and Engels, and refer to the new changes in contemporary capitalist society to make a new interpretation of the concept of “the proletariat” that is in line with the characteristics of the times. “Being compelled by their lack of ownership of the means of production to sell their labor power to capitalists to earn a living” is the core feature of “the proletariat” described by Marx and Engels. In the modern world, the persistence of social groups of this profile demonstrates the continued strong explanatory power and applicability of the concept in contemporary times. It is worth noting that the new changes in contemporary capitalist society objectively constitute a challenge to Marx and Engels' conception of “the proletariat”. As modern Marxists, we should defend and develop the concept of “the proletariat” in the modern context, and make new provisions and interpretations of “the proletariat” on the premise of adhering to its rational core. Specifically, the scope of application of this concept should be expanded from the narrow sense of material production to the broad field of labor with much diversity, and the targeted group of the concept should be adjusted from the absolute poor to the relatively poor, thereby endowing this classic concept with stronger and broader explanatory power.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    An Examination of “Historical Generativism” and “Historical Determinism”
    Bian Weiwei, Zhang Wenxi
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (8): 41-49.  
    Abstract1362)      PDF (6647KB)(272)       Save
    Both the logic of Hegel's philosophy of history and the logic of Marx's historical materialism start from a presumption of “history”. Different opinions of the “law of history” lead to different conceptions of the “history”. Historical materialism holds that history is nothing but the activity of man pursuing his aims. This indicates that its “ontology of history” is not about the “law of reason” in the sense of Hegel's philosophy of history, but is about the “law of practice”. Historical generativism is a conception of history based on historical materialism as understood with the materialist dialectical thinking. It respresents an understanding of Marx's materialist dialectical thinking that history is nothing but the activity of man pursuing his aims. In contrast, historical determinism is a conception of history in the sense of materialism as understood with the “thinking of understanding”, showing a transcendence of Hegel's idealistic dialectics that history is a rational process. The limit of historical determinism lies in that it obscures the meaning of the dialectical relations between social being and social consciousness. However, the rationality of historical generativism lies in that it accurately defines the nature of history as the philosophical representation of the “law of the practical history”, instead of trying to propose an abstract “general philosophy of history” concerning the sociohistorical development.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Data Factor's Dual Attribute and Its Interaction Effects
    Guan Xingmiao, Qin Xingfang
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (8): 68-76.  
    Abstract1320)      PDF (5925KB)(193)       Save
    Data has become a factor of production. This occurs when history enters the era of big data, in which technologies such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and blockchain are used to collect, mine and process data. Data is a special product of labor, a derivative of other production factors. The data factor has a dual attribute: being physical or technical, and meanwhile being social. The social dimension of the data factor can not only materialize the technical dimension but also amplify it, ie. it has the multiplication effect on the allocation efficiency of other production factors. The social dimension is brought out via the medium of the technical dimension. Viewed purely from a technical perspective, this medium is strongly adhesive; after being bonded with other factors of production, it will only lead to physical reaction and not change the nature of other factors. However, once the two dimensions interact with each other, especially when combined with capital, the most adhesive factor in the market economy, a series of new social relations will then be produced based on this medium. Significant adjustments in social relations may ensue, involving both positive and negative externalities. Therefore, to get a scientific understanding of the dual attribute and its interaction effects of the data factor, it is necessary to take the following steps. One the one hand, we should promote institutional designs that amplify positive externalities, with a focus on facilitating public data sharing and improving commercial data development. On the other hand, we need to strengthen institutional arrangements that prevent and control negative externalities by emphasizing data supervision based on data types and levels as well as the rule of law.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Ideological and Political Theories Teaching in All Courses in the New Era: Core Problems and Feasible Approaches
    Shi Yan, Wang Xuejian
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (9): 91-99.  
    Abstract1283)      PDF (6832KB)(366)       Save
    It is necessary to deepen the research of its values, core problems, and ways of construction within the framework of broad ideological and political eduacation in the new era in order to comprehensively promote the ideological and political theories teaching in all courses in colleges and universities. The core problems of this teaching are mainly manifested as large divergence in perceptions, deficiency in the course system, difficulties in the selection of methods, poor coordination in implementation, the absence of teachers' agency, the ambiguous definition of management power and responsibilities, among other things. In order to strengthen the ideological and political theories teaching in all courses and genuinely improve the effectiveness of fostering virtues and nurturing talents, it is necessary to make systematic efforts, such as consolidating the education ideal, establishing an appropriate education pattern, optimizing course construction, innovating teaching methods, improving coordination, training teachers and strengthening the management system, and cultivate talents for both the Party and the State.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Marx's Theory of Banking and Its Practical Value
    Wang Guogang
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (8): 14-.  
    Abstract1202)      PDF (10826KB)(280)       Save
    Marx's banking theory is an important part of the Marxist economics. As argued by Marx, the formation of the banking system is premised upon the following five socioeconomic conditions: the transformation of interestbearing capital to moneydealing capital, the full development of the credit mechanism based on the commercial credit, the sufficient presence of the monetary demand, the multiple deposit channels for and increasing amount of the money flow, and the adequate development of bookkeeping. Marx presented a systematic elaboration of the operation mechanism of the banking system from three perspectives: the emergence of the bank credit, the functioning of the credit money, and the creation mechanism of the credit money. Marx fully recognized the positive role of the bank credit mechanism, but also revealed its negative effects in the capitalist mode of production. Marx's banking theory is of important guiding significance for China in the process of deepening the financial supplyside structural reform. Specifically, China needs to further improve its financial statistics and make up for the inadequacy in the financial data. It is also necessary to facilitate the development of the commercial credit and consolidate the foundation of the bank credit. And China should also optimize the payment mechanism to prevent systematic financial risks.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Pathways of Chinese-style Modernization towards the Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation
    Xin Xiangyang
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (10): 20-24.  
    Abstract1195)      PDF (3213KB)(293)       Save
    There are many pathways to promote the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation through Chinesestyle modernization. From the perspective of civilization, Chinesestyle modernization vitalizes the inherent spiritual core of Chinese civilization, making its material foundation incomparably strong; from the perspective of democracy, Chinesestyle modernization promotes the development of socialist political democracy that has enabled the Chinese people to become masters of their own country and society, and ensures that the people give full play to their enthusiasm, initiative and creativity; and from the perspective of the rule of law, in a civilized society abiding by the rule of law not the rule of men, China jumps out of the modernization trap experienced in some other countries. China has achieved rapid economic development, longterm social stability, with the people living and working in peace and contentment and modernization progressing smoothly. 
    Related Articles | Metrics
    A Theoretical Analysis of the Source and Determination of Value in the Digital Economy
    Yan Jinqiang
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (3): 33-42.  
    Abstract1193)      PDF (7287KB)(288)       Save
    The new or digital economy characterized by informatization, networking, and intelligence is not only changing social productivity, but also reshaping the relationship between social production and commodity value. The analysis of the source and determination of value in the digital economy needs to be carried out within the framework of Marxs labor theory of value. Recognizing key features of the digital economy, this paper divides the labor value into the value of the physical labor and that of the digital labor, and makes a theoretical analysis on this basis. The paper argues that since products enabled by digital technologies have virtualization features such as laborfree, carrierfree and high spillovers embodied, the components of the product value include both the physical labor value and the digital labor value. Among them, the value of digital labor is mainly transferred from the revenue of other sectors and laborers through value transfer, and its size is positively related to the scale of the digital economy. The high spillovers embodied in the product value is reflected in the economies of scale, closely relating to the virtuality of the digital economy.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Revolution of 1911 and the Search for a Path to the Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation
    Li Kunrui
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (6): 97-105.  
    Abstract1162)      PDF (6423KB)(238)       Save
    The revolutionary pioneers of the 1911 Revolution, represented by Sun Yatsen, put forward the political program based on the Three Peoples Principles of nationalism, democracy, and peoples livelihood, adhered to the broadest revolutionary united front, and carried forward their lofty spirit of working with unshakable resolve, thus leaving a great legacy in the history of the search for a path to national rejuvenation. The experience of and lessons drawn from the Revolution of 1911 provide significant enlightenment for the Communist Party of China (CPC) to lead us forward. We must uphold the leadership of the CPC, which unite the Chinese people and lead them in waging a fierce struggle. We must also carry forward the great spirit of Party building in the struggle. The search for a path to national rejuvenation is grounded on that China was gradually reduced to a semicolonial, semifeudal society. It was for the first time that the bourgeois revolutionaries realized the cause of national rejuvenation and promoted the exploration of the road to national rejuvenation. The Revolution of 1911 is an important milestone in the history of the search for a path to national rejuvenation.

    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Historical, Theoretical and Practical Logics in the Development of Ideological and Political Education
    Song Youwen
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (10): 76-83.  
    Abstract1124)      PDF (1116KB)(389)       Save
    The disciplinary construction and academic research of the ideological and political education in contemporary China started from discussions on the scientification of the ideological and political work. A review of the development of the ideological and political work towards scientification and disciplinization clearly displays the historical, theoretical and practical logics in the evolution of the ideological and political education in China. In the new era, it is necessary to observe the dialectical unity of the three logics, and constantly promote the development of the ideological and political work towards a higher level of scientification, institutionalization, and modernization. We should establish a system of theories of the ideological and political education that responds to practical demands of the new era, centering around basic concepts, such as leading and shaping, selection and identity, difference and consensus, vitality and order, which reflect the laws in the operation and reception of the socialist ideology. In this way, we can make original contributions to facilitate the construction of the disciplinary, academic and discourse systems of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Theoretical Origin, Basic Connotation and Contemporary Value of the New Model of PartytoParty Relations
    Zhu Xu, Jin Di
    Teaching and Research    2021, 55 (7): 46-54.  
    Abstract1058)      PDF (6803KB)(223)       Save
    The new model of partytoparty relations originates from the thoughts on interparty relations of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and the Communist Party of China. It is an innovative development of the Marxist theory of interparty relations in the new era, in which seeking common grounds while shelving differences is the prerequisite, mutual respect is the key, and mutual learning is the goal. These three elements complement one another and together constitute the main content of the new model of partytoparty relations. The new model of partytoparty relations actively responds to changes in China and the world, provides scientific theories that keep pace with the times for the communications of political parties in the world, and is of important contemporary significance. It provides theoretical guidance for China to handle relations with foreign political parties in the new era, offers basic guidelines for promoting the construction of a new type of international relations, provides a Chinese solution for political parties around the world to properly handle interparty relations, and reveals the responsibility assumed by a great political party of a great country.
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Profound Implications of Enhancing the Political Consciousness of Always Exercising Full and Strict Party Selfgovernance
    Ding Junping
    Teaching and Research    2022, 56 (1): 14-23.  
    Abstract1039)      PDF (1919KB)(102)       Save
    Enhancing the political consciousness of always exercising full and strict Party selfgovernance means that the Communist Party of China should courageously insist on selfrevolution as always and unceasingly exercise comprehensive and strict selfgovernance,based on a full recognition of its extreme importance It is necessary to firmly center on the theme of sticking to the Partys ideals and beliefs and staying true to its original aspiration and founding mission It is also necessary to firmly conduct the main task of strengthening the Party's governing capacity,advanced nature and purity,and with political building at the center,continuously advance the great project of Party building A proper understanding of the profound implications of enhancing the political consciousness of always exercising full and strict Party selfgovernance is helpful to enhance the consciousness of continuously advancing the great new project of Party building in the new era

    Related Articles | Metrics